The million dollar question now will be does the word "killy" need to be redefined for purposes of use in NY? Or shall we all agree that nothing legal in NY can be considered killy?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Was it stated if the bill applies to existing property or what is sold/produced in the future?
Hmmm... Maybe guns are not the real problem?
The NY legislators are asking Governor Cuomo to sidestep the mandatory 3 day period for allowing comments on pending legislation. As bad as I find the suggested restrictions, the shutting down of possible public debate and discussion is just as bad.
http://bostonherald.com/news_opinio.../ny_poised_be_1st_pass_post_massacre_gun_bill
Was it stated if the bill applies to existing property or what is sold/produced in the future?
who the hell pulled '7' out of their ass when asked what the mag capacity should be?
If I was a company that made mags (and this passes), I would limit them all to 7 rounds. LEO, Mil etc... Tired of whats good for them is not good for us.
I'm so sick of this crap!!!!!! Fix kids, fix parents, fix family's, fix the schools, fix the economy etc. Find the real reason for all the shooting, suicides, drugged up kids/adults (prescription).
Geeze, when you could go into a hardware store and buy a full auto Thompson for a few $ and walk home with it in seconds, there were less shootings (forgetting the gangsters)
Guns got toned down and crime went up? Hmmm... Maybe guns are not the real problem?
I realize there are some compact style guns out there that could fill the 7 round maximum allowed magazine section of the new law. But, to expect the gun industry to manufacture 7 round mags just for NY residents is ludicrous. Even 10 round mags can be hard to find for some guns, nevermind trying to fond a 7 rounder.
The NY legislators are asking Governor Cuomo to sidestep the mandatory 3 day period for allowing comments on pending legislation. As bad as I find the suggested restrictions, the shutting down of possible public debate and discussion is just as bad.
http://bostonherald.com/news_opinio.../ny_poised_be_1st_pass_post_massacre_gun_bill
If I was a company that made mags (and this passes), I would limit them all to 7 rounds. LEO, Mil etc... Tired of whats good for them is not good for us.
I'm so sick of this crap!!!!!! Fix kids, fix parents, fix family's, fix the schools, fix the economy etc. Find the real reason for all the shooting, suicides, drugged up kids/adults (prescription).
Geeze, when you could go into a hardware store and buy a full auto Thompson for a few $ and walk home with it in seconds, there were less shootings (forgetting the gangsters)
Guns got toned down and crime went up? Hmmm... Maybe guns are not the real problem?
I understand that I shouldn't be trying to apply logic to political decisions, but 6 would have at least made some sense. so would 8. so would 30. I don't know of any currently produced magazine that holds 7 rounds that they could have used as an example.
What needs to happen is that gun owners as a whole - have to start appealing to - or FORCING the manufacturers somehow - to only sell to the government - the same things they would sell to civilians.
Barrett did it on his own - because he has some balls. I'd like to see if he follows thru and refuses to sell to the government at all if the Feds start really pushing some serious shit.
Look people - it's time to wake up and stop HOPING people will do the "right" thing - and start people (and companies) - PAY for not doing the "right" thing.
The best way to do that is thru the power of your wallet. The two gun buying sprees that Obama has fostered have shown loud and clear where the real power lies. It lies in the power of YOUR purse. It also lies in the power of the internet. If companies sell you out by refusing to sell into the civilian market in NY - but continue to sell to the government market - guess what - they have SOLD YOU OUT. They are arming up the government - and refusing to arm you.
This is just as much a threat to you as anything else. The 2nd wasn't put there for duck hunting. It was put there to protect against tyrannical government. If manufacturers will sell to the government - but not to you - then what you've got is virtual disarmament - while at the same time arming up the government.
You should be as pissed about that as anything else that is going on right now.
I understand that I shouldn't be trying to apply logic to political decisions, but 6 would have at least made some sense. so would 8. so would 30. I don't know of any currently produced magazine that holds 7 rounds that they could have used as an example.
You have got to be kidding me... There are Revolvers that hold more then 7 rounds. How the hell is that a compramise ?!?!
Did any one read the Heller decision? I can't read those things but one of the things that keeps popping up in my mind from a summary I read was that there was some expectation that 'guns in common use' should/would/could not be excluded for use by the people. To me this would mean that if 49 of the 50 states allow a certain firearm than 1 state could not forbid them. Couldn't the same be said about magazines in common use? Afterall, for many firearms there is no such thing as a 7 round magazine.
Perhaps someone with more legal expertise could read the decision and let me know how I am misinterpretting this.
Did any one read the Heller decision? I can't read those things but one of the things that keeps popping up in my mind from a summary I read was that there was some expectation that 'guns in common use' should/would/could not be excluded for use by the people. To me this would mean that if 49 of the 50 states allow a certain firearm than 1 state could not forbid them. Couldn't the same be said about magazines in common use? Afterall, for many firearms there is no such thing as a 7 round magazine.
Perhaps someone with more legal expertise could read the decision and let me know how I am misinterpretting this.
I'm not convinced they're smart enough, but it seems they decided on the number 7 for precisely that reason.