TBalls
NES Member
It's unfortunate that Starbucks has become a pawn in the fight against the Second Amendment. I feel badly for them, it is not a problem their business needed. I'll continue to drink Starbuck coffee when the mood hits me.
I'm with Brent on this one. It sucks for them that they had to make any official "decision" at all, but at the end of the day they've essentially instituted a non-policy. Just like laws that aren't enforced are meaningless, they've declared a "rule" and instructed their own employees not to enforce it. I don't condone what they've done, but I can appreciate the way they clearly intended to craft a very benign policy.