For all those who think that a multi language country is a good idea, please consider this:
Think about countries around the world where multiple languages are/have been the norm. Multi languages mean multi cultures, multi customs, multi religion, multi areas where these different cultures congregate and live...the word conclave comes to mind.
Most of these types of countries eventually end up in (at best) political conflict and (at worst) physical conflict. Even the partial breakup of Canada has been threatened with Quebec seceding and forming it's own country.
Look around the world, all these multi ethnic countries seem to be at war from within or at war with their immediate neighbors.
One of the biggest reasons that the US has prospered as it has, is that people CAME (mostly past tense now) here to be Americans, speak the language and become part of the melting pot which makes ONE country. In a melting pot, everyone blends in together for the common good.
By promoting multiple languages, pandering to different ethnic groups by making signs and advertisements in multiple languages, we are promoting divisiveness and will eventually pay a big price. With multi languages, there is no 'melting pot', only a pot full of rocks that are constantly bumping into each others' differences.
Ironically, the language issue is probably the easiest 'problem' of immigration to solve.
The mostly liberal attitude of 'diversity' will be the downfall of this country.
With no common language, there will be no US.
I agree with your last statement, no common lanuage there is no US.
But let us take your thesis a section at a time.
"Think about countries around the world where multiple languages are/have been the norm. Multi languages mean multi cultures, multi customs, multi religion, multi areas where these different cultures congregate and live...the word conclave comes to mind."
Come on Pilgrim, that has been the case since before 1776. Not everybody in the 13 Colonies spoke English, not all them were Christian. We survived as a country. As far as the Multi Area part, until very recently that held true with Boston, North End (Italian) Cambridge (Liberial), Brookline (Jewish) South Boston/Dorchester (Irish) Roxbury (First Jewish then Black). The US didn't implode neither did Boston.
"Most of these types of countries eventually end up in (at best) political conflict and (at worst) physical conflict. Even the partial breakup of Canada has been threatened with Quebec seceding and forming it's own country."
This hasn't happen in the history of this country and I doubt it will ever happen. We have always had cultural differences and yet in time of crisis we have stuck together. Example of that are blacks in the military during both WWII and Korea. What was the incentive for blacks to fight in those wars, they were viewed by a large part of the population as second class citizens, yet when duty called they voluteered why because even though America didn't think much of them they still were proud of their country.
"One of the biggest reasons that the US has prospered as it has, is that people CAME (mostly past tense now) here to be Americans, speak the language and become part of the melting pot which makes ONE country. In a melting pot, everyone blends in together for the common good."
You are talking as if that transition from immigrant to citizen happened in an instance and not over time. It is like talking about the good old times. Just like you are complainning now, we had people complaining then. I am sure someone back during the huge irish immigration into the US felt the same way but after TIME those Irish became incorparated into the Melting pot, to the point that few Whites can claim to be "pure" Irish or "pure" Italian or etc....
"By promoting multiple languages, pandering to different ethnic groups by making signs and advertisements in multiple languages, we are promoting divisiveness and will eventually pay a big price. With multi languages, there is no 'melting pot', only a pot full of rocks that are constantly bumping into each others' differences."
It is very hard for a person coming to this land to learn English overnight, it takes time. My Dad and Mom came to the US in 1968, were they not suppose to work because they only spoke Spanish? No they worked and with help of others became accustom to the country and its language. My Dad and Mom eventually learn the language, but my Brother and I became American because we were born here and were educated here. Now if back in 1968 had people advertised in Spanish it wouldn't have stop my parents from educating us in English, it would though have made it easier from them to shop. We (my brother and I ) served as tranlators to my parents for many years. Yet the melting pot continues.
"Ironically, the language issue is probably the easiest 'problem' of immigration to solve."
Actually it is the easist to solve over time. What you seem to be glancing over is unless you immigrant from a English speaking country, language and learning the language can only be solved with time. So if an immigrant arrives today, should he A) not work because he doesn't know the language or shop for food? B) My parents route of simply struggle your way through it until either someone helps you learn the language or you have kids to work as translators or C) Help people with the transition to America by getting them settled and at least acclimated with their new home. Foreigners/immigrants still have to do everything we do (shop and eat). With all that said the Children of these immigrants are the true results of the melting pot.