...
http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...end-christianity-banner-premier-league-match/
Polish football (soccer) fans unveiled an enormous anti mass migration banner at Sunday’s Silesian Wrocław match against Poznań. Images from the match last night show a giant crusader defending Europe from invading jihadists in boats labelled USS Hussein, USS Bin Laden and USS ISIS.
(Emphasis mine).
Saddam-* or Barack-*-Obama?
That was masterful of the Polish banner makers.
... people who preach genocide against Muslims are not proposing a REAL solution - because the simple fact of the matter is that it's simply not going to happen. You're talking about killing over a billion people. Even the Nazis and the Commies at their most efficient couldn't reach those numbers and Western liberal/progressive democracies are just simply not equipped to do that kind of thing.
When you argue for genocide - what you're REALLY arguing for is for US to turn into some sort of abject tyranny along the lines of the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany. ...
So what you may be arguing for in the end - when you argue for genocide - is for the complete and total destruction of the West - and it's complete subjugation to Islam in the end. ...
Twelve years ago someone pointed out that just because
you don't think
your posse can git 'er done, doesn't mean that the job ain't getting done. The job may get done after you've tried and failed, or after you've failed to try, but that doesn't mean it's not done.
The Three Conjectures (*)
Executive summary: One day Muslim terrorists will poke the Bear or the Dragon too hard. Muslims will find the urge irresistible. And
that provocation is something up with which the Russians and Chinese will not put.
The possibility that genocide of the Muslim world may only happen after the destruction and subjugation of the West says nothing about whether or not it will happen.
Note well that this prediction doesn't violate your claim that only an abject tyranny would commit genocide. Russia and China have already got that part down pat.
(*) Supplemental reading:
- Nearly a year after the initial post of the Three Conjectures, blogger Joe Katzman summarized the most thoughtful commentary on it, as well as pointing to two essays which had preceded it: "3 Touchstones, 3 Conjectures". (The only thing Katzman missed was a link to "The Second Conjecture Revisited").
Every 2-3 years since the Conjectures were written in 2003 folks revisit them with additional serious analysis. Usually it is to see how events have proceeded in the interim, to judge whether the Islamic world retained a chance to survive nuclear holocaust at the hands of their victims.
After the Iran nuke deal I'd searched the Intarwebs in vain for anyone citing the Conjectures. Maybe Paris will trigger some more analysis.