1903Collector
NES Member
It's not like MA has special police units who go around confiscating firearms from people who become ineligible to legally own them (like in CA)
Not yet anyway!
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
It's not like MA has special police units who go around confiscating firearms from people who become ineligible to legally own them (like in CA)
They are out there people!
I wonder just how many people are felons right and don't even know it. My girlfriends dad was in this boat (unexpiring fid) and had guns , but had no idea he was breaking any law until I found out about it. It has to be a LOT of people
Not yet anyway!
In my town I believe I recall the PD notifying us of the changes with a letter by mail.
My brother and I both received the letter. A couple of friends who lived in towns
other than mine also received a letter.......Maybe not all towns did this?
But they're working on it.
I heard something very interesting on the scanner today.
A local PD was searching for a someone, don't know the reason, but they ran his name and the dispatcher said he showed an expired LTC from 2011, and no record of any gun sales. ????
Are they assuming he must still have some guns because they can't find any record that he sold them ???
In my town I believe I recall the PD notifying us of the changes with a letter by mail.
My brother and I both received the letter. A couple of friends who lived in towns
other than mine also received a letter.......Maybe not all towns did this?
Possessing a gun with an expired fid/ltc isnt a felony. Possessing a gun with no fid/ltc is.I wonder just how many people are felons right and don't even know it. My girlfriends dad was in this boat (unexpiring fid) and had guns
My first FID, issued in January, 1979, only had the issue date and time typed on the front of it by a Lawrence Police lieutenant, who was the licensing officer at the time. It did not say "valid until suspended/revoked" or anything of that nature, but had no expiration date either.OP:
If you have an LTC/FID, take possession of your dad's firearms immediately, as he's not in lawful possession of them, and will not be until he's properly relicensed. That applies to all ammo, too.
If you do not have the license, find someone that does. I'm not saying "sell" them - that leads to other entertainment - but just take them and properly store them.
Oh, and just to be clear - the general wording on the old FIDs was "Indefinite unless suspended or revoked" (at least all the ones I've had and seen) so, they revoked it.
Thank you everyone. I appreciate the sage feedback. After further investigation I have confirmed it is an FID card that my father has. Given that he lives in Worcester I fear he has a long, hard and expensive road to trek before (and IF) he secures that evasive LTC. Man, do I wish I could uproot to a real state like Texas!
Its not long or evasive. Ok it can be long. Just call the PD tell them the situation. My uncle in the same boat was asked to come to the PD with $100 and the old license. Boom! renewed license took 5 weeks. Worst case they will ask he takes a mass certificate course. Its not earth shattering.
He does NOT have to take the course if he's got one of the old "lifetime" FIDs. Those people are specifically grandfathered in.
There are more than a few departments that will demand it, based on their assessment of "suitability" and "discretion". It's not worth fighting about it and they know it.
Does "Suitability" and "discretion" apply to an FID?
There are more than a few departments that will demand it, based on their assessment of "suitability" and "discretion". It's not worth fighting about it and they know it.
Once case went to trial with the prosecution arguing that the law "obviously" never intended for the protection to extend 15 years. Defense argued the law did not specify a time limit and was clear. Court found for the defendant.Has anyone ever heard of someone getting in a legal jam (even just a "civil" fine) due to possessing a firearm with only an expired FID or LTC?
Technically true, but the court will generally find for the issuing authority (or, in this case non-issuing authority) in an FID denial case. The law requires the court to impartially review the denial before it issues a ruling upholding the decision.Not per MGL for FIDs although I know that some departments have tried to use that.