• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Obama Gets His Gun

Dear Mr. President,

Please stop patronizing us. We've been out smarting the anti gunners, including you, for 20 years. We didn't achieve that by being stupid, so show a little respect.

Sincerely,
the average American gun owner


P.S. Go f*** yourself
 
obamagun_zps817d3f67.jpg
 
it's been only a couple media commentators and insignificant minor district congressman so far, but the murmuring about rescinding the 22nd amendment HAS already begun. oscama has no intention of leaving the white house if that can really get done in the next 3 years.
Dictatorship. Seems fitting. Another part of the big plan. Or dare I say, final solution
 
Another analysis here:

As a lifelong shotgunner, I immediately smelled a rat. Nothing in the photo looks right and upon closer examination, it is a complete fraud.

One need go no further than examining the ports on the shotgun. Ports are tiny holes sometimes drilled near the muzzle (the business end of the gun) to release energy and reduce recoil. They serve as a pressure release valve of sorts. One will immediately notice that there is smoke coming from the right side of the gun in the photo as well as out the front. The only problem is that there is no smoke coming from the ports on the left side of the gun, clearly seen in the photo suggesting that the smoke was doctored into the photo. Furthermore, the smoke exiting on the right side of the gun does not match the port pattern on the left. If this gun was being fired as suggested by the White House, then the smoke would be coming out the ports on the gun clearly seen in the picture and evenly on both sides.


Read more: Photo of Obama Shooting Skeet Complete Fraud, like his Presidency
 
Last edited:
I never laughed so hard. Props you guys. I can't even design a Christmas card
 
the White House has warned people to NOT photoshop photos of Barry.....

"This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House."

not only are photographs taken by government employees during the course of their employment PUBLIC DOMAIN by definition....

What is a U.S. Government Work?

A United States government work is prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties.

It is not subject to copyright in the United States and there are no copyright restrictions on reproduction, derivative works, distribution, performance, or display of the work. Anyone may, without restriction under U.S. copyright laws:

reproduce the work in print or digital form;
create derivative works;
perform the work publicly;
display the work;
distribute copies or digitally transfer the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.

Exceptions

Other people may have rights in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights. Privacy and publicity rights protect the interests of the person or people who may be the subject of the work. To learn more about the difference between copyright and privacy and publicity rights, see the Library of Congress website.
You cannot use U.S. government trademarks or the logos of U.S. government agencies without permission. For example, you cannot use an agency logo or trademark on your social media page.
You cannot use a U.S. government work in a way that implies endorsement by a U.S. government agency, official, or employee. For example, you cannot use a photo of a government official wearing your product in an advertisement.
Works prepared for the U.S. government by independent contractors may be protected by copyright, which may be owned by the independent contractor or by the U.S. government.
Not all information that appears on U.S. government websites is considered to be a U.S. government work. For example, it is possible that some or all of the text, trademarks, logos, or images on a U.S. government website may be protected intellectual property not owned by the U.S. government, but used by permission of the rights holder. To ensure that you don’t mistakenly use protected intellectual property from one of our websites, check with the agency or program that manages the website.
The U.S. government work designation does not apply to works of U.S. state and local governments. Works of state and local governments may be protected by copyright.
Copyright laws differ internationally. While a U.S. government work is not protectable under U.S. copyright laws, the work may be protected under the copyright laws of other jurisdictions when used in these jurisdictions. The U.S. government may assert copyright outside of the United States for U.S. government works.

Where can I find more information?

Copyright Law of the United States of America, Section 105 – Read the section of the law that describes U.S. government works.
Frequently Asked Questions About Copyright – Find common answers to questions about U.S. government works from the CENDI Copyright Working Group.
What Are Patents, Trademarks, Servicemarks, and Copyrights? – Many people confuse copyrights with patents and trademarks.

If you have questions about U.S. government works, please contact the U.S. Copyright Office.


but PARODY is covered by FAIR USE even if they WERE copyrightable....

F*** YOU WHITE HOUSE....
 
"This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House."

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That pesky, archaic Constitution! Those liberals are right, we need to just get rid of it. We can't have people making fun of the President. Unless of course he's a Republican, then he and his family are fair game.

Just in case you thought it was only the Second Amendment they hated.
 
See guys...he IS one of US!!!
And he wants us to believe in him!!!
It is all for our own good.
Yeah Right!!!!!!!
I have never hated a standing president...Disliked maybe..but never hated before now!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom