Quiet
Banned
No, but there is no language that requires a Federal Judge to ignore circuit precedent because the legislature created an administrative appeals process. When we take cases, it's not based on that administrative appeals process. So that language doesn't apply. Other issues related to made up requirements exist from previous cases that are not affected or altered by that new language.
Wow. So they won't ignore/change/whatever made up requirements based on newly written law on the appeals process?
Oh, we are talking about different things. I thought you guys were going to take cases to create/enforce precedent of adherence with the new law, such as blanket restriction policies.
Or maybe I'm just lost. Which is likely.