Re: Don't listen to dispatchers
LOL! You speak the truth!
UGH!! That's just great!! That makes a lot of sense... allow someone to have a gun, but not have any practice with it unless they're shooting at other people in a life/death situation. Way to go Lowell!
I understand the "employment" restriction would limit carry to employment related tasks, which in my case could still be fairly flexible... but what would a "protection" restriction limit? Any ideas? Seems to me I could claim I'm using it for protection at any time... unless they're going to require me to present an exigent circumstance that I would need protection for... (transporting cash, valuable goods, etc...) And without said items, I'd be in violation? I dunno... I'm just speculating but it seems too vague.
Scrivener said:Their volume is in inverse proportion to their knowledge.
LOL! You speak the truth!
BAD assumption. Anything other than "ALL LAWFUL PURPOSES" is now - thanks to GOAL's counterproductive intermeddling - a RESTRICTED license.
UGH!! That's just great!! That makes a lot of sense... allow someone to have a gun, but not have any practice with it unless they're shooting at other people in a life/death situation. Way to go Lowell!
I understand the "employment" restriction would limit carry to employment related tasks, which in my case could still be fairly flexible... but what would a "protection" restriction limit? Any ideas? Seems to me I could claim I'm using it for protection at any time... unless they're going to require me to present an exigent circumstance that I would need protection for... (transporting cash, valuable goods, etc...) And without said items, I'd be in violation? I dunno... I'm just speculating but it seems too vague.