^this
seeing nothing to provide basis of the search, unless he stupidly authorized it
are size 36 pants more expensive than size 34? There’s no reason a 19X “should” cost more than a 19.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Looks like every Thug in Dorchester has a Glock and a High cap Mag...
- Thread starter DeadEyeDan
- Start date
^this
seeing nothing to provide basis of the search, unless he stupidly authorized it
are size 36 pants more expensive than size 34? There’s no reason a 19X “should” cost more than a 19.
They pulled a guy over for dark tint and an illegal turn, and smelled marijuana (legal) and saw a scale (legal) and plastic bags (also legal) and that gave them license to search him? Or was it just being nervous during a traffic stop?Demerits all around for no throwdown embroidered shoulder patches.
Did Nelson give permission to search the passenger compartment,
and if not, what was the probable cause that a crime was being committed?
P. S.
My guess is that the guy let them. All you gotta do is mumble OK and all that stuff goes out the window. Sure Police lie, we will never know, but the type of low level grey market weed dealer who smokes in his car while carrying an illegal pistol, plus one with the SN filed, isn't evaluating the risk/reward ratio very well. Smarter riff raff are not carrying guns to protect a little weed.
AHM
NES Member
If it wasn't for Teh Intarwebs I wouldn't be pre-loaded to discard that testimony
just like "glassy-eyed" during a DUI stop.
About the latter:
Cops can't help themselves -
recently I realized they even put their boilerplate DUI testimony
into press releases and TV news liveshots.
I have a prediction.
I call it "my prediction".
To wit:
Old and busted: Prosecutors complaining that
the fad of police techno-procedurals like CSI
had juries discounting multiple innocent bystander witnesses
confessions, etc., etc. unless the State's case included
irrelevant kewl stuff like DNA evidence.
New hotness: Juries (if not courts) discounting permission to search
unless it's captured on body cams.
You know it's only a matter of time.
DeadEyeDan
NES Member
Officers Arrest Suspect Wanted on Several Outstanding Warrants, while Recovering Firearm and Drugs in the area of 112 Southampton Street, Roxbury — bpdnews.com
About 1:41am on Sunday, January 17, 2021, officers assigned to District C-6 (South Boston) were on patrol in the area of 112 Southampton Street, when they noticed a large crowd gathered around a motorcycle at the corner of Southampton Street and Atkinson Street. The officers observed that the motorc
bpdnews.com
Guy is from Dorchester... am I the only one seeing the pattern here... Must be the style in DOT.
Well sort of. How light the charges are.....or how willing the da is to bargain down depends on
1. The color of your skin
2. If your a law abiding ltc holder or not.
I think you can figure out what means what.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2012
- Messages
- 4,129
- Likes
- 1,789
I guess they believe the 2nd Amendment more than you.
Officers Recover an Illegal Firearm and Arrest One Following a Traffic Stop in Dorchester — bpdnews.com
About 1:30am on Thursday, 14, 2021 officers assigned to District B-3 (Mattapan) made an on-site firearm arrest following a traffic stop at Glenway Street and Fowler Street, Dorchester. While on patrol, officers observed a blue motor vehicle with excessive tint, stopped on Bradshaw Street with its
And I can’t buy the damned Glock I want here or have mags over 10 rounds in Boston...
Criminals don't follow laws.
Every Thuggie McThuggerton has a high-cap because they can just go to NH and buy one like the founders intended. The only thing keeping us from doing the same thing are some pesky words on a sheet of paper at the state house and that we believe in them.
Every Thuggie McThuggerton has a high-cap because they can just go to NH and buy one like the founders intended. The only thing keeping us from doing the same thing are some pesky words on a sheet of paper at the state house and that we believe in them.
Soundwave
NES Member
It's not legal to drive under the influence. Unless they were smelling the actual marijuana and not marijuana smoke?
Based on what ive seen in MA, a lot of otherwise law abiding gun owners don't, either, at least not when it comes to the most senseless laws.
Lol they don't even do that, they just get it that way when the gun came to them off the street.
AHM
NES Member
"Fresh marijuana".
In Massachusetts, that smell does not constitute
Last edited:
