If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
AK.
Thread can be closed now.
I'm always inclined to say "Steyr AUG" in these topics because I think the idea behind them is ingenious (bullpups in general)...but I'm not sure how they perform on the battlefield.
I believe they are standard issue with the Australian armed forces.
I fired a bullpub at the last ca shoot, I want to say it was a PS2000 or something like that, chambered in .223. Anyways, I was really surprised at the accuracy and the lack or recoil for it's compact size, which is all due to the design. I'd love to pick up an AUG someday.As someone who likes to think in terms of economics, the AK, hands down.
I'm always inclined to say "Steyr AUG" in these topics because I think the idea behind them is ingenious (bullpups in general)...but I'm not sure how they perform on the battlefield.
I fired a bullpub at the last ca shoot, I want to say it was a PS2000 or something like that, chambered in .223. Anyways, I was really surprised at the accuracy and the lack or recoil for it's compact size, which is all due to the design. I'd love to pick up an AUG someday.
Until then I'll stick to my AR & AK. Just gotta figure out what I want in 7.62x51 now. I'm kinda partial to the G3/HK91 design, but who knows I might end up with an M1A
That's gotta be it, I remember the brass going foward and landing in fairly neat piles and it taking AR mags. This FS2000 had a three optic system on it though that was pretty friggin B/A too.probably the FN FS2000.. I just picked one up a couple of weeks ago and had it out for the first time last weekend.. All I can say is I am really impressed. Light, handy, short, short manageable, no recoil, and the thing shoots!!!
Front ejection is HUGE for picking up your brass too!! And it takes AR mags!
To me it's way up there with the Aug and ps90.
When you have two enemies each with a weapon in hand, but one of the enemies is dead, the weapon in the hand of the alive party is clearly the bettererer of the two.
Either that or one of them is a better shot.
I believe they are standard issue with the Australian armed forces.
Which ever one you can shoot better. Does no good shooting through 2x4's if you can't hit one at 300 yards.
when it comes to assault rifles,is there a clear cut champ,or a major debate?
Something that shoots in the 30 cal range (.308, 30-06, 7.62x51)
7.62x39 is a .308 short!
Can anyone see the hidden message...
You can hit a 2x4 at 300 yards with an AK, just have to aim about 20 inches high.
I vote for the AK b/c I have a great one and love it, I also can't afford to finish my AR right now so who know...but then again I probably won't be able to afford to shoot it once it is built.[sad2]
There will always be a debate...Some say AR's, some say AK's, I say: Anything that shoots 7.62x51. HK G3, M14, FN-FAL...Not necessarily in that order...