Get out now, then.
Already have my secondary and tertiary residence set-up.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Get out now, then.
Well, although this is not a particularly good example because the Constitution specifically grants you the right to bear arms, I think the country would work a lot better if we had a lot more federalism. If you want to live in a state with a weapon ban, Illinois in this case, so be it. If you want to live in a state, like VT or NH, where they take 2A rights a lot more seriously, so be it. The reason our politics are so broken however is that Feinstein and Schumer want to impose CA and NY on TX and NH.
Help me out here, guys. I know that most states do not have a gun registration. But don't the FFLs have to keep the paperwork for 20 years or so? Means, if the BATF really wantedto know where the guns are, wouldn't they get at least some of them by just checking the LGS records?
We just won this victory.http://www.illinoiscarry.com/news//3-94.phpLook at a map... Illinois is a big state, and at least as big as New England... that would be like equating people from Cambridge with people from Houlton Maine. Chicago is tucked into a small corner of it... the rest borders Missouri (and the St Louis metro), Kentucky, Indiana, and Iowa.... seems like the perfect place. City vs Country.
No. Per McDonald, 2A applies to the states through the 14A. Therefore, neither the states nor the federal govt can infringe on 2A.
Introducing a law like this should result in impeachment and the death penalty. I'm talking about a legal process here -- not vigilantism. We have no liberty if at every turn we are forced to monitor our government, petition, oppose, and lobby in hope of protecting that liberty from their repeated threats. A free man cannot be at the mercy of his government. They should be at the mercy of the people and live in fear of even suggestion of law such as this.
Yup. Sorry cowboys, but I bet everyone here would turn in their guns just on a phone call from the cops. 'Hello mr. Smith this is sargent jones from the town police you have 24 hoirs to turn in (list weapons) or be arrested for felony possesion'
Everyone will cave, wait for someone else to do something, uh we'll just fight in the courts or with the ballot box. That'll work<sarcasm>
Well, although this is not a particularly good example because the Constitution specifically grants you the right to bear arms, I think the country would work a lot better if we had a lot more federalism. If you want to live in a state with a weapon ban, Illinois in this case, so be it. If you want to live in a state, like VT or NH, where they take 2A rights a lot more seriously, so be it. The reason our politics are so broken however is that Feinstein and Schumer want to impose CA and NY on TX and NH.
Introducing a law like this should result in impeachment and the death penalty. I'm talking about a legal process here -- not vigilantism. We have no liberty if at every turn we are forced to monitor our government, petition, oppose, and lobby in hope of protecting that liberty from their repeated threats. A free man cannot be at the mercy of his government. They should be at the mercy of the people and live in fear of even suggestion of law such as this.
There is no right way to fight something like that. If you give up your gun(s), they win.
If you don't, you go to jail. They win.
If you fight, they will have it all over the news, and it's going to be "See, they shoot LEOs. They shouldn't have guns". They have the PR they need. You're dead. They win.
Jesus Christ stop being so ****ing French. When someone displays or threatens to display authority you don't need to castrate yourself and hand over the jar with your balls in it right then and there.
Shoot enough of them and the people supporting them and you solve the problem. Yes, you'll have to kill more than one or two. It would probably also help to burn some houses down.
Jesus Christ stop being so ****ing French. When someone displays or threatens to display authority you don't need to castrate yourself and hand over the jar with your balls in it right then and there.
Shoot enough of them and the people supporting them and you solve the problem. Yes, you'll have to kill more than one or two. It would probably also help to burn some houses down.
Jesus Christ stop being so ****ing French. When someone displays or threatens to display authority you don't need to castrate yourself and hand over the jar with your balls in it right then and there.
Shoot enough of them and the people supporting them and you solve the problem. Yes, you'll have to kill more than one or two. It would probably also help to burn some TV STUDIOS DOWN[/QUOTE]
Just helping it along
- - - Updated - - -
They are not worth keeping.WTF the news says there 80-125 million gun owners REALLY ? OK 2012 election was 120ish mil Voters Romney lost by 3% WTF your telling me even if only half of us screamed and yelled (40 million) we are not going to be heard.....anf then the NRA has a whopping 4 million members.. Something really wrong here. I feel gus owners are so devided where almost certainly doomed! I have already lost several in my small circle..they just couldnt give a shit either way.
They have lost all touch of the constitution the US....frustrating!
Just seeing this, shows how far down the rathole this country has gone in four years.
I don't want Frenchman to feel like he can't retaliate in kind, so to be fair and socialist about it, I'm Polish and Austrian. A dubious duo I know, so have at it.
BTW the Polish side of my family escaped after Hitler invaded. That would be a large stone in the foundation of why I don't take kindly to people throwing in towels on fights that should be fought, fought fiercely and done so without concern for who's feelings might get hurt.
explains the monkey arms in the Spalling thread
How is it remotely constitutional to confiscate something legally purchased??
firearms that would be banned include all semiautomatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns.
Mags would be limited to 10 rounds and owners of existing magazines holding more than 10 rounds would have to register them with the state police.
There is no right way to fight something like that. If you give up your gun(s), they win.
If you don't, you go to jail. They win.
If you fight, they will have it all over the news, and it's going to be "See, they shoot LEOs. They shouldn't have guns". They have the PR they need. You're dead. They win.