At this point, it's not as though we need another reason not to vote for this fascist.If this is true, its not good
Obama is a piece of shit PERIOD
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
At this point, it's not as though we need another reason not to vote for this fascist.If this is true, its not good
At this point, it's not as though we need another reason not to vote for this fascist.
Obama is a piece of shit PERIOD
That doesn't make any sense at all. There are estimates of 60 to 80 million guns in the U.S. and if they tried to confiscate them all (oh, except those held by the criminals of course) there'd be a second revolution.
If your friend has some access to these Obama people he ought to suggest to them when they are done researching how Australia made it's gun confiscation program work - that they read some American history as further research. Tell them to start with April 19 1775.
I just heard from a very good friend of mine who is very savvy to the gun laws and a 2nd Amendment buff as well.
He told me that obama already has some of his people over in Australia to find out how they implemented their gun confiscation program and how they made it run so smoothly.
I guess if this topic has come up here I must have missed it. If this is true it could mean if elected may be one of his agendas. I know obama is not a friend to the gun owner by any means and I know he will do what he can to take away our rights but I guess I never entertained the thought of him heading up a gun confiscation program here in the US.
what do you guys think? Have you heard this rumor?
"Want my guns? Click-Click......come get em!
That doesn't make any sense at all. There are estimates of 60 to 80 million guns in the U.S. and if they tried to confiscate them all (oh, except those held by the criminals of course) there'd be a second revolution.
I would ask your friend to substantiate the rumor.
Obama is clearly no friend of ours. But there is no way he would try something like that.
Excerpt from http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15304
After Australian lawmakers passed widespread gun bans, owners were forced to surrender about 650,000 weapons, which were later slated for destruction, according to statistics from the Australian Sporting Shooters Association.
This is probably the biggest reason they wont try it. With estimates around 200 million, it would be easier to find and deport all the illegals than the guns.
Can you imagine running for President on an agenda that would make +25% of the population criminals?
Yes.This in a lot of respect, and with tin foil at firmly on, is EXACTLY the reason TO do it. It is all abput power and control.
Most will just go along and follow the laws, give up their guns as the hurdles and expenses be come too onerous.
Some others, will give up most of their guns, maybe keep one, secretly and become de facto criminals.
The Elite, will keep everything they have and get what every they want, they have enough money as to be untouchable.
Divide and conquer, at some point it will become a class thing. "those that arent paying their fair share and criminals have guns. It's time we get rid of this archaic second ammendment thing, it is a relic of the past. It was badly written and was only meant to protect the armed forces of the US anyway".
It ultimately gives the Govt more power and more control..
This in a lot of respect, and with tin foil at firmly on, is EXACTLY the reason TO do it. It is all abput power and control.
Most will just go along and follow the laws, give up their guns as the hurdles and expenses be come too onerous.
Some others, will give up most of their guns, maybe keep one, secretly and become de facto criminals.
The Elite, will keep everything they have and get what every they want, they have enough money as to be untouchable.
Divide and conquer, at some point it will become a class thing. "those that arent paying their fair share and criminals have guns. It's time we get rid of this archaic second ammendment thing, it is a relic of the past. It was badly written and was only meant to protect the armed forces of the US anyway".
It ultimately gives the Govt more power and more control..
That's the way to do it. One at a time...I'll give mine back-- Bullets first.
Depending on how he does it, I think you'd see anything from 60-80 million gun owners turning into aobut 45-50 million sheep and turning in their guns. If he tries it too heavy-handedly (and why are we annointing him C in Ci already???), assuming that he does win the election, we might very well see a lot of small uprisings. I doubt we'd see a big one, but whoever gets tasked to steal the guns from the citizens probably won't be able to get much in the way of life insurance.I wonder if something like you detail might come to pass in this country - I think if it did however, you would see some states seceding and going off on their own.
That's the way to do it. One at a time...
Depending on how he does it, I think you'd see anything from 60-80 million gun owners turning into aobut 45-50 million sheep and turning in their guns. If he tries it too heavy-handedly (and why are we annointing him C in Ci already???), assuming that he does win the election, we might very well see a lot of small uprisings. I doubt we'd see a big one, but whoever gets tasked to steal the guns from the citizens probably won't be able to get much in the way of life insurance.
That's the way to do it. One at a time...
Depending on how he does it, I think you'd see anything from 60-80 million gun owners turning into aobut 45-50 million sheep and turning in their guns. If he tries it too heavy-handedly (and why are we annointing him C in Ci already???), assuming that he does win the election, we might very well see a lot of small uprisings. I doubt we'd see a big one, but whoever gets tasked to steal the guns from the citizens probably won't be able to get much in the way of life insurance.
However, there is one thing now that wasn't around before - the internet, and specifically the "blogosphere". Coverups just are NOT as easy to do.Figure with virtually full control of the press it'd be fairly easy to ask them to NOT report any sort of "Police Matters" that are part of an "ongoing investigation".
With regard to just about any size uprising that HAD to be reported on just label them as "right wing extremists", a cult or a gang war.
Blah! we've seen it all before! They were whackos! Glad there gone!
However, there is one thing now that wasn't around before - the internet, and specifically the "blogosphere". Coverups just are NOT as easy to do.
We need to have a permitting system, so we can check out the backgrounds of internet posters. I think that $100/year is a reasonable fee... we can have a graduated permit system, too. One that allows you to only post on sports and celebrity topics, and another, unlimited one that allows you to post on anything. Call that one an All Lawful Topics permit.Don't we need some common sense regulation of the internet though?
We need to have a permitting system, so we can check out the backgrounds of internet posters. I think that $100/year is a reasonable fee... we can have a graduated permit system, too. One that allows you to only post on sports and celebrity topics, and another, unlimited one that allows you to post on anything. Call that one an All Lawful Topics permit.
I would ask your friend to substantiate the rumor.
Obama is clearly no friend of ours. But there is no way he would try something like that.
Now that would kick ass...And all computers, Blackberries and other devices with internet access must be registered.
Those with FIOS or similar "high speed" access must be on an Approved Internet Roster (AIR) and can be sold only to those with Class "A" - Access licenses.