71montess
NES Member
Don’t let the streams cross !What is stream and twitch stream, and I don't want to "Google" it.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Don’t let the streams cross !What is stream and twitch stream, and I don't want to "Google" it.
Scuse me while I go eat some humble pie
Don’t be so quick to give the liberal antis an inch. We already compromise with the 20,000 or so gun laws on the books now. Let them eat shit.f*** that. Never got a shot, one time I caught covid I had a fever and chills and body aches. Tylenol and motrin handled the fever which got rid of everything else.
I am willing to bet that most of the kids here in Montana under the age of ten know more about firearms and firearms safety than Agnotology. A training course does nothing but check a box. A right that is passed on from generation to generation, and is honored and respected, is the most valuable training on earth. Agnotology; interesting handle. I am willing to admit my ignorance though. I had to look up the term.Here’s an idea: Only shoot at clubs that require an orientation that goes over basic firearms safety. I live in a constitutional carry state. We don’t have any more firearms accident than the gestapo states that mandate what you want to mandate here. And I shoot at a private club that vets it’s members prior to allowing them to shoot there.
That’s a lot better solution than you suggesting a government that wants to disarm the populace to decide who can or can’t own or purchase firearms.
Actually yes. If you don't want to live with that feeling of fear, don't go to the range. And that's what it is, a feeling. Getting shot at a range from someone else negligently discharging their firearm is not a statistically significant hazard.What, because I don't want a moron who doesn't know the safety from the trigger in the next lane shooting me because he was too stupid to read the manual? Because they don't know how to clear their firearm without pulling the trigger? I don't care who wins a Darwin Award, I just don't want them to give me theirs. Here's a great quote from Carlin - "Imagine the intelligence of the average person. Now realize half of people are stupider than that."
If you aren't safe enough to own a gun in public then they shouldn't have let you out of jail...Hell if I took an informal survey I could probably get at least 100+ votes that say "Background checks to buy guns are completely foul" and IMHO thats not even a remotely extreme position in my book.
Strictly speaking? Nothing.Scuse me while I go eat some humble pie
Since I now need to update my brain, what prevents a Democrat majority SCOTUS from ruling Heller, Bruen, Miller, got it wrong? That Roe v Wade was right ? There is nothing to prevent the laws see-sawing then? In which case, nothing matters besides who is in power.
Would it now ?That is terrifying if that isn't a hyperbolic statement.
and would put you directly at odds with the 2A
Please explain how the desire to defend oneself from another whose intent is to take your life, liberty or property?That is terrifying if that isn't a hyperbolic statement.
and would put you directly at odds with the 2A
Because most of the Marxists you run into today are counter to his actual philosophical writings. Not that I agree with either of them, apart from his notions regarding private firearm ownership.Would it now ?
How would that be ?
But Marx believed in corporate ownership of arms not an individual right.Because most of the Marxists you run into today are counter to his actual philosophical writings. Not that I agree with either of them, apart from his notions regarding private firearm ownership.
the terrifying bit was saying 'listening to them scream'. Implying torture. Or a long, slow death.
No ,most of them want you disarmed and at their mercy.Because most of the Marxists you run into today are counter to his actual philosophical writings. Not that I agree with either of them, apart from his notions regarding private firearm ownership.
the terrifying bit was saying 'listening to them scream'. Implying torture. Or a long, slow death.
I imagine the state would take an approach similar to California's ban on "unserialized firearm precursor parts."“The Linksy-Eldridge bill would prohibit possession of ghost guns and the manufacturing of a 3D-printed gun without a federal firearms license, and would ban distribution of digital instructions to program a 3D printer to manufacture or produce firearms and some components.”
You can’t down the manufacturer firearms plan a FFL and you can’t ban information..
Those are clear first and second amendment..
Might be able to swing making you put a serial number on it and registering it which is also bullshit but at least that’s in the ballpark of reality
The ghost is in the machine and cannot be removed.“The Linksy-Eldridge bill would prohibit possession of ghost guns and the manufacturing of a 3D-printed gun without a federal firearms license, and would ban distribution of digital instructions to program a 3D printer to manufacture or produce firearms and some components.”
You can’t down the manufacturer firearms plan a FFL and you can’t ban information..
Those are clear first and second amendment..
Might be able to swing making you put a serial number on it and registering it which is also bullshit but at least that’s in the ballpark of reality
It's a precursor part if it is marketed as such.I imagine the state would take an approach similar to California's ban on "unserialized firearm precursor parts."
View attachment 727744
This includes 80% lowers / unfinished receivers.
Firearm Precursor Part Identification Guidebook
I would like to draw the reader's attention to the firearm precursor part in the lower right photo below:
View attachment 727745
I did see that wording. But I think if you ran into a kid fresh out of the academy, and an aggressive prosecutor, your McMaster Carr order could end up in evidence and reason may go out the window.It's a precursor part if it is marketed as such.
Simply sell paperweights and state modifications to your product are violations of your terms of service and void any implied warranty.
Yep, you can beat the charge but enjoy the ride...I did see that wording. But I think if you ran into a kid fresh out of the academy, and an aggressive prosecutor, your McMaster Carr order could end up in evidence and reason may go out the window.
lol I have rifles from the 50s without serial numbers
But Marx believed in corporate ownership of arms not an individual right.
So to say you agree with Marx is to side with those that believe the 2A is tied to militia service (Marx's intent was for people to own arms only for revolution)
No ,most of them want you disarmed and at their mercy.
That has never changed.
Disarm and then slaughter.
10's of millions under communist rule.
If you don't know that , shame on you , history is just a few clicks away or read a book.
If you do know that and are just spouting communist propaganda about how lovely it would be under communist rule , shame on you too.
As far as "Terrifying" You obviously haven't been around enough to even know what that is if you find that terrifying.
Prey you live a good enough life to never see the true meaning of it .
Marx makes no statement to that, via private letters, or published books. He spoke and wrote often and repeatedly about how important individual people having firearms was, and that any attempt to disarm the general populace should be resisted, violently if necessary. You can extrapolate and guess at what he *really meant* but no one is a mind reader, and it's not like we have much in the way of surviving letters to read into. Marx was pretty well hated even in his own time - i think 11 people showed up to his funeral. Or maybe 13. It was a low number.
In fact, Marx didn’t believe in individual rights at all. Instead, Marx saw firearms as a means to an end, and the end was revolution. “The whole proletariat must be armed at once with muskets, rifles, cannon and ammunition,” he explained, “and the revival of the old-style citizens’ militia, directed against the workers, must be opposed.”
None of this is about crime. Or dead kids. Or Mass shootings. It’s all merely an excuse to pass gun control.Licenses are for subjects. Anything less than constitutional carry is homosexual.
I'm curious what other rights you think should need a permission slip for
That is an opinion piece, based on extrapolations and assumptions, using the actions of people who never met Marx beyond his written works as proof of what Marx originally intended. The meaning between the lines is based in bias. The closest thing you could possibly find, and I am going off of memory, would be some of his writings during the German Uprisings around the late 1840s where he predicts that those in charge will force the "workers" to put down their arms once victory is attained and the goals of a constitutional republic are attained.Why Karl Marx Supported Gun Rights - Intellectual Takeout
Karl Marx didn’t support the right of workers to bear arms because he saw it as an inalienable right. He supported gun rights because they were a means to an end.intellectualtakeout.org
If you don't believe in individual rights then you cannot support the 2nd in either its text or intent, period.
The entire bill of rights is to limit the government’s infringement on the inalienable rights of the individual.
Turner Diaries... that was a hard book to finish. I read it for probably the same reason you did, so I'd know for myself what was in it. When I finished that one, I felt like I needed to go play with a pile of puppies for the rest of the day.The same way I've read the bible, the Qu'ran, the Turner Diaries, Mein Kampf, etc, I've read Marx.
Don’t be so quick to give the liberal antis an inch. We already compromise with the 20,000 or so gun laws on the books now. Let them eat shit.
Turner Diaries... that was a hard book to finish. I read it for probably the same reason you did, so I'd know for myself what was in it. When I finished that one, I felt like I needed to go play with a pile of puppies for the rest of the day.
I started reading Unintended Consequences, but when I was just a couple chapters into it I happened to catch a live stream audio interview with the author. He sounded drunk, and crazy. I never finished that one.
Marx makes no statement to that, via private letters, or published books. He spoke and wrote often and repeatedly about how important individual people having firearms was, and that any attempt to disarm the general populace should be resisted, violently if necessary. You can extrapolate and guess at what he *really meant* but no one is a mind reader, and it's not like we have much in the way of surviving letters to read into. Marx was pretty well hated even in his own time - i think 11 people showed up to his funeral. Or maybe 13. It was a low number.
Hi. If you aren't going to read, why reply? for the.... 16th time it feels like. I don't support any form of Marxism. Not Leninism. Not Stalinism. Not Communism. Not Socialism. Not Democratic Socialism. Not a single form. I am familiar with the books. The same way I've read the bible, the Qu'ran, the Turner Diaries, Mein Kampf, etc, I've read Marx. I've never said communist rule is amazing. You are putting words in my mouth.