Gun charge dropped for Worcester man with shotgun & loaded pistol in uninsured, unregistered vehicle

[Coyote33]

Gun charge dropped for Worcester man with shotgun & loaded pistol in uninsured, unregistered vehicle​

Gun Charge Dropped For Worcester Man With Shotgun & Loaded Pistol In Uninsured, Unregistered Vehicle

The only things in the driver’s possession that were licensed were his guns.

www.newslinklive.com

 

[Spartan65]

“Prior to his arraignment, the charge of Possession of Large Capacity Feeding Device was dismissed at the request of the Commonwealth because De La Hoz had a valid license to carry.”

I would assume they were pre-ban mags then obviously? Even if so it still speaks volumes that he was initially charged. Scary shiz.

 

[VetteGirlMA]

Amazing that even had to get that far.

 

[Coda]

"The only things in the driver’s possession that were licensed were his guns."

 

[Coda]

I am sure now they are trying to figure out how they can grab his LTC. They must of hated having to drop that gun charge.

 

[appraiser]

well,MA is still marching to their own tune so suitability is a reason bullshit to revoke.

 

[one-eyed Jack]

How the hell did he get the shotgun into the center console? Jack.

 

[MadatMarek]

Profiling, double locked the handcuffs? Must be one bad hombre

 

[greencobra]

with the scotus ruling and this within the past month...in my lifetime, we've got proof that pigs can actually fly.

 

[Coyote33]

I am sure now they are trying to figure out how they can grab his LTC. They must of hated having to drop that gun charge.

If they try "suitability", this could be a good starter case.

 

[MaverickNH]

How the hell did he get the shotgun into the center console? Jack.

Sawed-off barrel and pistol grip

 

[Coda]

Sawed-off barrel and pistol grip

Then there would have been gun charges. I am sure they looked at every way they could have possibly revoked his LTC.

 

[Coda]

with the scotus ruling and this within the past month...in my lifetime, we've got proof that pigs can actually fly.

I know…… With the recent SCOUS ruling this story makes me wonder if MA law enforcement is seeing the handwriting on the wall.

 

[mac1911]

Gun charge dropped for Worcester man with shotgun & loaded pistol in uninsured, unregistered vehicle​

Gun Charge Dropped For Worcester Man With Shotgun & Loaded Pistol In Uninsured, Unregistered Vehicle

The only things in the driver’s possession that were licensed were his guns.

www.newslinklive.com

Shocked

 

[Coyote33]

Gotta wonder if he is connected. Somehow, somewhere. Maybe cartel?

 

[free]

"The only things in the driver’s possession that were licensed were his guns."


I didn't know we can get our guns "licensed."

 

[Coda]

"The only things in the driver’s possession that were licensed were his guns."


I didn't know we can get our guns "licensed."

LTC is a "License to Carry", and he had one.

 

[Coyote33]

"The only things in the driver’s possession that were licensed were his guns."


I didn't know we can get our guns "licensed."

For what it is worth, you don't get your car a license either. Nor do you get every fish a license. You do, however, get an annual license for your dog. You're just being ridiculous at this stage.

 

[nstassel]

I see this frequently where the police see a standard capacity magazine and charge large cap violation even though there's a valid ltc. I frankly think they just don't understand where the real possible crime is and I'm not going to spell it out here for them.

 

[free]

For what it is worth, you don't get your car a license either. Nor do you get every fish a license. You do, however, get an annual license for your dog. You're just being ridiculous at this stage.

No, you don't get it Wylie - you missed the point.

 

[Coyote33]

No, you don't get it Wylie - you missed the point.

Oh no, I get it. People are licensed, not the guns. It is just over the top when people keep trying to make the distinction when everybody gets it.

 

[EJFudd]

I would assume they were pre-ban mags then obviously?

I wonder. This is the kind of detail the popular leftist media never gets right or doesn't care to report... or doesn't understand at all.

 

[180 GRAIN FMJ]

I see this frequently where the police see a standard capacity magazine and charge large cap violation even though there's a valid ltc. I frankly think they just don't understand where the real possible crime is and I'm not going to spell it out here for them.

Isn't is almost always a "tack on" charge though? I don't recall hearing of any cases in which an LTC holder was charged with only a mag violation, but I could be wrong.

 

[nstassel]

Isn't is almost always a "tack on" charge though? I don't recall hearing of any cases in which an LTC holder was charged with only a mag violation, but I could be wrong.

I've had it a couple times but it's not common.

 

[180 GRAIN FMJ]

I've had it a couple times but it's not common.

Were they actually convicted?

 

[nstassel]

Were they actually convicted?

no always dismissed since an ltc allows possession of a magazine over ten rounds.

 

[AHM]

I would assume they were pre-ban mags then obviously? Even if so it still speaks volumes that he was initially charged.

If so, maybe the Commonwealth realized that
(eager cop notwithstanding)
they had no way to prove they were illegal beyond a reasonable doubt.

Which would be a very interesting "tell".

 

[bolt]

I smell hi-cap contributions!!!
Good luck 1%ers heh, Best wishes to all?

 

[free]

Oh no, I get it. People are licensed, not the guns. It is just over the top when people keep trying to make the distinction when everybody gets it.

Calm down coyoteman.

 

[bolt]

a 1%er eeh?