If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Do you have verifiable info Healey will be compelling the surrender of pre-7/20 ARs?
Some guy on FB who said he worked for the P.O. claimed since it was sent bulk mail a return to sender would be tossed by the local P.O. unless you placed a 1st class stamp on itI got my letter yesterday. I'm returning to sender.
Some guy on FB who said he worked for the P.O. claimed since it was sent bulk mail a return to sender would be tossed by the local P.O. unless you placed a 1st class stamp on it
If he said he worked for the P.O. then he doesn't. It's the Postal Service. Back in my PictureTel days I worked with a number of them, if you said Post Office they would be all over you.
Do you have a nonresident license?Well I feel lucky. received mine today here in NH so do I need to make an appointment with your AG to turn all illegal items in?
Question here. I know there are lawyer types around, and I'm looking for general legal precedent/guidance, not specific advice on a course of action. What's generally needed to achieve standing to file a suit for something like this? Is a generic letter like this enough, or would the state actually have to be filing charges against you specifically?
Anyone else get two addressed to them...
This state is clueless must mean that they are positive that I have one, I honestly don’t have any love for bumps and would much rather put the money in to the someday I’ll be able to afford a sub gun fund
View attachment 219362
Yup... you get a letter for every license you have.
That is true. I asked my Postmaster about this a long time ago.Some guy on FB who said he worked for the P.O. claimed since it was sent bulk mail a return to sender would be tossed by the local P.O. unless you placed a 1st class stamp on it
I really want to believe you. But honestly?
"Twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action" is just as valid a counter argument.
Don't think for a minute that isn't on their radar either. That's Maura's next move in fact.
Joking aside, I’m returning my letter with a big MOLON LABE and SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED written on it.
If bump stocks could be bought by anyone (no proof of a firearms license required), then is the Commonwealth discriminating against legal gun owners by sending only them letters? Since this law applies to ALL in the Commonwealth, shouldn't everyone be getting a letter
Doesn't matter gun owners are not a protected class, the state also does not officially recognize being ammosexual.