Definitely not good money. I am not particularly interested in it as a toy because is so darn ugly, and because it doesn't come with any history/action type novelty, etc.
I do not see the point of this pistol for any practical purposes. Its much too big to carry concealed (although it is very light) - its larger in all dimensions than even a large framed Glock. For home defense, it might be nice if it the SS190 was available to the general public, but since the current selection of ammo emasculates the gun, I don't see any benefit in lethality over a 10MM or .45. Sure the round tumbles and all that, but its not enough to guarantee a kill, it failed to do that 74.5% of the time at Fort Hood. Moreover, there are complaints that even the 5.56, which also tumbles, and packs a lot more power, doesn't do that. If I am not mistaken, that's part of the reason for the 6.5mm, 6.8mm, and .50 Beowolfe rounds. Existing rounds 10MM/.45/357mag or sig all generate more energy, make a bigger entrance hole, have equal or better penetration (I believe). And while they may not tumble as aggressively, the hollowpoint option will allow for ample internal damage.
Ammo capacity is a bit overrated beyond 10 - 15, imo. Sure 30/31 rounds would be nice, but I figure if the 21 I can put into my G20 aren't enough, I'm screwed anyway.
And the final nail in the coffin for me is the fact that I've read a couple of threads questioning its reliability, including one with a first hand account detailing a catastrophic failure (Kaboom) which caused significant injury to the shooter. I'll stay away from that. BTW, while I understand that you can't believe everything everyone posts, this post was very detailed, offered photographic documentation, and other threads mentioned the possibility of the 5-7 firing out of battery - which if I am not mistaken lends credence to that account of the accident.
And yet, it sure is an ugly gun.