David Gregory may be pompous, above the law, one of the beautiful people, etc., but I would like to know how Mr. Gregory obtained the magazine in the first place. Someone must have purchased the mag, then sent in motion a chain of possession which put the mag in Gregory's hands. Wouldn't everyone who touched said mag be in violation of the DC statute? IANAL, but if I read the statute correctly, mere possession is enough to be found guilty, punished by $1,000 fine or year in the big house. Personally I would love to see Mr. Gregory spend a year in lockup, but I doubt it would ever happen.
Perhaps anyone with a legal background can comment?
Thank you.