If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I feel like I should know this already, but can .308 Garands shoot full powered "regular" 308 ammunition, or do they need certain loads like their 30-06 counterparts? This is more for my own edification as I have no plans to add a 308 M1.
No need for special 308 ammo or an aftermarket gas plug. Good to go.
I would think 7.62 NATO of any flavor would be fine, it would be hot "hunting" .308 commercial stuff I might be concerned about.what about surplus 7.62 NATO? Too hot?
762 nato is on the "pooysay" side of loads for 308.what about surplus 7.62 NATO? Too hot?
762 nato is on the "pooysay" side of loads for 308.
A proper 308 m1 will basically handle all but the extreme stout loadings. But theres reall no reason to push 200 grain bullets at 2800 fps through a 308 M1
YesPardon my ignorance, but do .308 rounds just fit into the M1 Garand 30-06 clips?
For NRA service rifle the CMP field grade special in 308 is a great choice. Now if price is not much of an issue and your looking for a nice old wood and iron rifle for NRA Service Rifle this is about as good as it getsI see there are gradiations, but they are definitely confusing. I think the HCF are more targeted to collectors as being somehow more valuable?
I see field grade at 650, and HCF at 980, Service Grade at 750, and special field grade at 850, and rack-grade sniper at 955.
What would be the best one to get for my purposes? I mean...I've just bought some stuff and might not jump on it right now unless someone convinces me, but for example, but I'd consider trying it for NRA Highpower Service Rifle competition, so which of those is the right thing for me? The price between those isn't a problem. I'm not a collector, I'm willing to repair/refurbish/replace things with the goal of having something suitable to use in a competitive setting.
Thanks,JRP
+1 and/or do what I did, and get one of each!In the end if you are looking for a shooter and collecting is of no concern the CMP service grade or CMP specials in 308 or 30-06 are a good deal.
mil surp aficionado's, save me a google search, please. not a rifle shooter, what are these .308 m1s about? I never realized they made those in that caliber. were they made up special? issued somewhere? and something I didn't know either, it sounds like military/nato ammo is loaded down compared to commercially available hunting loads. am I getting that right? I should get out more and i'd probably know these things.
I feel the need to apologize for basic questions, I'm clueless when it comes to this stuff, but interesting it is. I do cruise the mil surp forum a lot, very interesting to me.These are conversions from ordinary .30-06 M1 rifles. The CMP installs a new .308 barrel during their refurbishment of the rifle into a "Special" grade.
ahhh, I see, thanks. may I ask....what was the reason cmp converted the rifles? is .308 more desirable in hi power matches over 30-06?
I feel the need to apologize for basic questions, I'm clueless when it comes to this stuff, but interesting it is. I do cruise the mil surp forum a lot, very interesting to me.
you don't need the block in the magazine on a .308 Garand since the 30-06 is too long to chamber anyway. Bolt won't close and you'll feel silly, otherwise nothing bad happens.
ahhh, I see, thanks. may I ask....what was the reason cmp converted the rifles? is .308 more desirable in hi power matches over 30-06?
I feel the need to apologize for basic questions, I'm clueless when it comes to this stuff, but interesting it is. I do cruise the mil surp forum a lot, very interesting to me.
According to my Hornady manual, .308 is seen as "slightly more accurate" than 30-06 in a Garand. There's nothing sourced or anything for that claim, though. I've only fired 30-06 Garands, so I can't speak to that.CMP has special rifles in both calibers. People like .308 because it's generally cheaper and has wider availability and variety than .30-06. 7.62 NATO surplus is still around, while the .30-06 surplus is pretty much gone or as expensive as new production stuff. I don't know if the 7.62x51 is considered more accurate by the serious shooters or not.
As far as competition, I'm a bit hazy on the rules and differences between NRA and CMP matches. You can't use a .308 M1 in a "As-Issued" CMP match, but can in less restrictive categories.
I think price of ammo is the primary reason people buy these.
All I know is that the CMP installs them in their conversions and explicitly lists not being able to load .30-06 as the reason.
The bolt won't close all the way, so you're not going to fire the round intentionally. With the M1's free floating pin, there is a slim chance of an Out of Battery slamfire, which would be very nasty.
It's a cheap safety feature that does nothing detrimental to the rifle. Why wouldn't you want it?
the shift to 308s is more in my mind the availability of ammo. Surplus M2 ball (30-06) is for the most part no longer manufactured or "cheap" a few companies are making M1 safe 30-06 like PPU and Creedmoor plus Federal makes some also.ahhh, I see, thanks. may I ask....what was the reason cmp converted the rifles? is .308 more desirable in hi power matches over 30-06?
I feel the need to apologize for basic questions, I'm clueless when it comes to this stuff, but interesting it is. I do cruise the mil surp forum a lot, very interesting to me.
just a touch on "accuracy"According to my Hornady manual, .308 is seen as "slightly more accurate" than 30-06 in a Garand. There's nothing sourced or anything for that claim, though. I've only fired 30-06 Garands, so I can't speak to that.
While it is known the Navy converted some, I speculate CMP had some receivers with shot out barrels (or no barrels) and did the conversion since .308 is currently a more popular and cheaper cartridge, esp. if they can safely shoot all but the hottest 308 (whereas the 30-06 Garand requires lower power loads compared to some modern charges). It's also possible they just had some of the Navy ones. I'm expect someone will refute or corroborate this.
As Matt noted, in CMP M1 matches you cannot use the 308 Garand. The 308 Garand is OK for modern service rifle, though.
Correct; as I mentioned the claim in the manual is an unqualified and unelaborated "more accurate" statement, which I read as being of interest to competitors. Since it's a reloading manual, I would presume the intended audience is either competition shooters or those seeking accurate reloads, generally speaking.just a touch on "accuracy"
M1s new did not have a accuracy requirement from the Army. Over hauled M1s have a standard testing (batch testing mind you with the best lots of ammo tested)
M1s, M14s M2 ball and M80 (Nato ) are not held to a high standard for accuracy. Think 9 ring of a SR target for either rifle or cartridge.
They can do better of course but think of it like this. The rifles and mil ammo is plenty good enough for GI at 5 moa