Serious.
My Norton security software reported the page on this link has dangerous malware and would not let me browse there.
Kaspersky did the same.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Serious.
My Norton security software reported the page on this link has dangerous malware and would not let me browse there.
It can't hurt essentially. Wish there was more good news. It could eventually lead to a SCOTUS case which could go either way, likely not our way if those on this forum don't get over their butt-hurt and come to terms with even a RINO putting in justices is better than Bernie or Hillary (merrrrrr but we need Cruz or Trump... merrr rubio merrrr amnesty). It could also be influential to a 1st circuit or lower court challenge that effects us, but influence would be the best it could do.
Mike
So when can I place my order for a case of Pmags? That was obviously in jest, but what's the realistic outcome for those of us in MA?
For the most part people on this forum dont matter, aside from you nh people. Ma will not be giving any support to an r therefore mocking Rs is perfectly acceptable.
The opinion was authored by Circuit Chief Judge Traxler - a Clinton appointee. Just saying........
In other words, under the Seventh Circuit’s view, a significant restriction on a fundamental right might be justified by benefits that are quite literally imagined into existence. Needless to say, we see much to question in the Seventh Circuit’s decision.
They had this to say about the 7th Circuit decision in Friedman, a case that was denied cert by SCOTUS this term.
For the most part people on this forum dont matter, aside from you nh people. Ma will not be giving any support to an r therefore mocking Rs is perfectly acceptable.
They still vote in the primary, and only one candidate is electable.
Mike
Unusual? How many AR's and AKs are floating around out there? http://gunssavelives.net/blog/court...s-and-unusual-not-protected-by-2nd-amendment/
- - - Updated - - -
Brought to you by this handsome judge
So when can I place my order for a case of Pmags? That was obviously in jest, but what's the realistic outcome for those of us in MA?
For **** sake man. Is It really going to stopping you from getting the mag you want?
For me, yes. IMO, the consequences aren't worth it to save a few bucks on magazines.
The LGS I go to in NC, has a crap load of loose 10 round mags for sale. Must be from mag ban staters that moved to NC.
Just go to Riley's or Cabela's in Maine - what happens from there is between you and God.
Or they're left over from the 10 years when the Federal AWB was in place, and people are still upgrading. Your LGS would probably have a better time wholesaling those to gun shops in mag-limit states. Those shops could sell them to someone who wants a spare or three.
I think I have the deer-in-the-headlights-cause-I'm-from-Mass look, they'd probably card me.
- - - Updated - - -
My brother has a whole stash of pre-bans that he won't give me in case he moves back to a ban state. Meanwhile he bounces around between free states like he's teasing me. Arggh.
Conflict must go to Scotus now.
Could land fill see an uptick on tossed 10 round mags?
The LGS I go to in NC, has a crap load of loose 10 round mags for sale. Must be from mag ban staters that moved to NC.
There in no reason why a resident of MA should have to carry 4 mags to carry the same number of rounds I carry in 2, unless I was carrying two 30 round P30 mags for my wife's VP9.
Or maybe I should get a Glock 19 so I can use those nice $40 33 round mags. Ha!
Conflict must go to Scotus now.
Could land fill see an uptick on tossed 10 round mags?
The LGS I go to in NC, has a crap load of loose 10 round mags for sale. Must be from mag ban staters that moved to NC.
There in no reason why a resident of MA should have to carry 4 mags to carry the same number of rounds I carry in 2, unless I was carrying two 30 round P30 mags for my wife's VP9.
Or maybe I should get a Glock 19 so I can use those nice $40 33 round mags. Ha!
Judge Agee and Judge King), held that the exemption for retired police officers did not violate equal protection.
So does this ruling change anything in Maryland, or they can continue with their AWB?
I grew up in Maryland, have family there, but they're all antis. I was just curious.
What a pile of poop
Under the light of strict scrutiny and data from the sunset of the federal AWB, I don't think the state can "prove that the restriction furthers a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest"
This should be the death knell for the AWB in Maryland and should lead to ripple effect on other states.
Some animals are more equal than others. Look at Massachusetts. That latest cluster specifically exempted cops from the AWB. When LA passed their safe storage laws recently, they exempted cops because "they might need their firearms to defend themselves".
Under the light of strict scrutiny and data from the sunset of the federal AWB, I don't think the state can "prove that the restriction furthers a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest"
This should be the death knell for the AWB in Maryland and should lead to ripple effect on other states.
If SCOTUS made a decision that ruled the AWB unconstitutional, they would have a no choice. Anyone arrested on any charges would have an easy win in court.We can only hope.
Of course as far as the MA AWB goes, we would need a case in the federal First Circuit (which includes Mass.) that took notice of such a decision, or a SCOTUS decision that ruled the AWB unconstitutional, *and* we would need the Commonwealth to abide by that decision, when they have a history of not abiding by court decisions they don't like.