If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Im not worked up about it, but it is akin to all those laws that we say will do nothing to stop a criminal. Like MFLR said, he loses some business because of the rule, but I am sure the range overall appears to be a bit safer. Hell, I stopped going to AFS after watching the untrained public try to shoot on their own. (Not that training should be mandatory) so I see merit for the rule in a slightly different way as well.
Anyone that cared about the sport, the way of life, etc. and offed themselves with a gun at a range is an effin cowardly scumbag. If you disagree I don't really give a shit. Go freeze to death, eat a bottle of Valium, run the car in the garage.. Don't go and do something that will make some pussy liberal douchebag try to pass more effin laws to ruin everyone else's lives.
Dude just stop.
Anyone that cared about the sport, the way of life, etc. and offed themselves with a gun at a range is an effin cowardly scumbag. If you disagree I don't really give a shit. Go freeze to death, eat a bottle of Valium, run the car in the garage.. Don't go and do something that will make some pussy liberal douchebag try to pass more effin laws to ruin everyone else's lives.
Wow! Tons of hypocrisy in this thread! How can some of you say we should not need a permit to exercise our rights and then also say that these ranges should only let people with permits rent guns?
What hypocrisy?
There's a big difference between one's natural rights and the rights of a private business owner to operate his facility in the way that he sees fit. The business owner's policy does not infringe on your rights whatsoever, as you are perfectly free to shoot somewhere else, or buy a gun somewhere else, or rent it somewhere else. The business owner is not coming into your home/property and telling you what you can and cannot do, like the government can if it abuses its power.
-Mike
What hypocrisy?
There's a big difference between one's natural rights and the rights of a private business owner to operate his facility in the way that he sees fit. The business owner's policy does not infringe on your rights whatsoever, as you are perfectly free to shoot somewhere else, or buy a gun somewhere else, or rent it somewhere else. The business owner is not coming into your home/property and telling you what you can and cannot do, like the government can if it abuses its power.
-Mike
Then what would your "fix" be if we lived in a free state that did not require permits?
Then what would your "fix" be if we lived in a free state that did not require permits?
If a business owner wants to make people pass a test before using their facilities then that's fine by me. What's hypocritical is saying that we shouldn't have to have LTC permits to exercise our rights and then say "Let's use those very permits to factor who can and can't use our range". Are you saying that you should be able to use "Bob's" facilities, but someone from a town that it's impossible to get a permit should be told to go screw? That is what I'm saying is hypocritical.
There is no "Fix". The business owner is using known statitical probability to reduce the chances of having another suicide on his own Private Property . His choices are logical and legal. If you dont like it dont frequent his establishment!
If the private business owner wants to tell someone to go screw, for any reason that's his prerogative. That has NOTHING to do with gun rights, permit issuance, or any of that crap. He'll bear the burden of his decision one way or another via free market forces. Unlike the situation with bad government, with private entities I can voice my displeasure with their decisions if I want to by taking my money somewhere else.
-Mike
, it won't reduce the number of potential suicides.
The insurance companies live by numbers! The numbers are 1/30,000 coming in the door has the intent of doing this at a public range. They also say that 99.5% of these bastards come alone,have usually been there before etc. etc. They also say that 99% that do it don't own a firearm, and that's why I changed my rules to LTC,Member,Safety Course Certificate etc.
LTC people and alike- most likely own a firearm, and would do the job at home. I turn people away every week,lose much needed money to pay some huge bills, piss off a few that give me bad reviews - but I sleep better at night that we put the safety of our people & customers above profit. It's not a fool proof system - but it's a good way to reduce the chances of a bad day.
Again...I never said that. I called it out as hypocrisy (which is what it would be).
It would be like a person saying they are 100% for people being able to take a dog wherever they want and then posting a sign on their door that read "no dogs allowed"
What it will do, for sure, is reduce his amount of potential customers.
Don't need to pig pile on you but - People that go to AFS,Bob's Tactical,MFL and others go there to learn. New people in this sport,hobby,right to own etc. need a place to learn,and we offer just that. Years ago I was at a Manchester Gun Show all set up to sell eight tables of stuff, looked around and realized that the Dealers & Crowd were mostly old! Same stuff as before,same dealers,same inventory,same customers too!
I walked away from that show and started ladies night,encouraged families to come in with children, and eliminated a paid guest with members to encourage bringing friends. Ten years later, we have 1,250 Members,35-40% of all folks in the door are women,and some of these women are bringing in the children to learn - and average 3,000 + people a month using our facility. Without places to learn,many would never do so, and the anti gun crowd would be larger due to the lack of education.
Next time you visit AFS or any local club - and see people doing something unsafe - why not ask if they would like some help?
I find it a thrill to take a new person out,teach them to shoot safely, and have them leave with a huge smile! Try it,it's rewarding....
One of my Members is the wife of a murdered police officer, it would be so easy for her to have hatred of firearms and the gun community.
This woman is amazing! She brings her two boys in to learn,shoot and have fun. She even bought one of them a Bushmaster M4 for Christmas. This may have been different if we were not here for her and those boys.
Suicides are real,they're ugly for all that deal with them, and make the news every time.
What about the ones we prevent? What about the people we teach, that walk away knowing enough so an accident does not happen?
You can't measure that!
Its not hypocritical, its common sense.
Too much CSI. Wait... what does CSI stand for?
How is it hypocritical? You still haven't explained that. Also, using what I posited above, there is an alternative to not having a permit- bring a friend, or bring your own guns, so that gets the "permit" issue off the table.
I'll take "Bad strawman using excessive hyperbole for $1000, Alex!"
This sort of policy is more like "Your dog is welcome in our store as long as it's vaccinated and on leash". The proportion of people it's likely to annoy is not going to be statistically significant.
Apparently you've never been to MFL or any other range with a similar policy on a cold weekend. Yeah, they're turning away tons of people!!!!
-Mike
Some ranges require a permit OR that you are accompanied by one other adult on the range. (I think MFLRs policy is this way, not sure).
If the private business owner wants to tell someone to go screw, for any reason that's his prerogative. That has NOTHING to do with gun rights, permit issuance, or any of that crap. He'll bear the burden of his decision one way or another via free market forces. Unlike the situation with bad government, with private entities I can voice my displeasure with their decisions if I want to by taking my money somewhere else.
-Mike
Don't need to pig pile on you but - People that go to AFS,Bob's Tactical,MFL and others go there to learn. New people in this sport,hobby,right to own etc. need a place to learn,and we offer just that. Years ago I was at a Manchester Gun Show all set up to sell eight tables of stuff, looked around and realized that the Dealers & Crowd were mostly old! Same stuff as before,same dealers,same inventory,same customers too!
I walked away from that show and started ladies night,encouraged families to come in with children, and eliminated a paid guest with members to encourage bringing friends. Ten years later, we have 1,250 Members,35-40% of all folks in the door are women,and some of these women are bringing in the children to learn - and average 3,000 + people a month using our facility. Without places to learn,many would never do so, and the anti gun crowd would be larger due to the lack of education.
Next time you visit AFS or any local club - and see people doing something unsafe - why not ask if they would like some help?
I find it a thrill to take a new person out,teach them to shoot safely, and have them leave with a huge smile! Try it,it's rewarding....
One of my Members is the wife of a murdered police officer, it would be so easy for her to have hatred of firearms and the gun community.
This woman is amazing! She brings her two boys in to learn,shoot and have fun. She even bought one of them a Bushmaster M4 for Christmas. This may have been different if we were not here for her and those boys.
Suicides are real,they're ugly for all that deal with them, and make the news every time.
What about the ones we prevent? What about the people we teach, that walk away knowing enough so an accident does not happen?
You can't measure that!
Oh...one last thing. I was also never giving these business owners crap for having a policy like that. I was calling the people here hypocrites for saying LTC's should be required to shoot at a range while in other threads they boast about how we should not be required to have LTCs. A business owner has the right to do something hypocritical, IMO, if it means better business.
The government requiring a license for you to exercise your rights is entirely different from a private business trying to reduce its risk.Wow! Tons of hypocrisy in this thread! How can some of you say we should not need a permit to exercise our rights and then also say that these ranges should only let people with permits rent guns?
Sure you are.Oh...one last thing. I was also never giving these business owners crap for having a policy like that.
I've never suggested that a range should or should not have this policy. I completely understand why they have this policy and I believe it reduces the number of suicides at ranges that have this policy. It is up to the business owner to decide whether or not to enact such a policy, and I have no problem with such ranges either way.I was calling the people here hypocrites for saying LTC's should be required to shoot at a range while in other threads they boast about how we should not be required to have LTCs.
He called me back also and apologized for not calling last night, he said his cell & the shop phone were ringing off the hook. I read him some of this thread. He does appreciate the support.Just got off the phone with Jack and he's doing as well as expected and told me he appreciates the support from NES.
Bob had a professional clean up crew in last night to disinfect the place and the plan is to have no business interruption.