The Boston Garden, the Bank or where ever else someone WITH NO LEGAL AUTHORITY tells me I can't.
If they tell you they don't allow people to carry on their property, and you do anyway, then you're breaking the law.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The Boston Garden, the Bank or where ever else someone WITH NO LEGAL AUTHORITY tells me I can't.
If they tell you they don't allow people to carry on their property, and you do anyway, then you're breaking the law.
what law is that
I guess the whole idea of approaching someone about it,then going to someone else,threw me for a loop.
I would have just made a 180 and left before I tried to justify anything to an retail employee.
He is right,he is Vellnueve.
I wouldn't have said anything to begin with.
It's not jailtime or fines; it's the threat of suitability denial that does it. People in Mass are scared of their own freakin' shadows.
Just tonight, I've posted in threads here where people were asking if it was legal in Mass to make their own 10-round mags, or to own a handgun with a laser or flashlight.
Adding to that are the idiots that will openly post/ask in an open forum whether something somebody is selling (or has) is legal, and we have a climate of fear.
If they tell you they don't allow people to carry on their property, and you do anyway, then you're breaking the law.
If they tell you they don't allow people to carry on their property, and you do anyway, then you're breaking the law.
Not here. If they find out you're carrying, ask you to leave, and you refuse - then you're trespassing, and that's breaking the law. But disobeying a sign is not breaking the law unless they catch you.
ETA: MXD beat me too it.
If they tell you they don't allow people to carry on their property, and you do anyway, then you're breaking the law.
What law? Trespassing?
In the case of a sign, good luck proving that the accused was "informed" that this wasn't allowed.
A trespassing charge might withstand better scrutiny, if, for example, the person evaded screening, and was proven to "know" up front that the property owner didn't allow/want guns on the premises, but even that might be a stretch.
-Mike
Even then, a "no guns allowed" sign does not equal trespassing. Only a no trespassing sign or a refusal to exit the property when asked to do so would hold up as trespassing.
If they tell you they don't allow people to carry on their property, and you do anyway, then you're breaking the law.
Vellnueve stated if they tell you, not if they post it on the sign.
Yes, this is the point I am trying to make...
-Mike
Ohhhhh, I missed that. I thought you were saying the no guns allowed sign = trespassing is possible although very very hard to prove.
Vellnueve stated if they tell you, not if they post it on the sign.
It still makes no difference until they tell you leave and you do not. They can even tell you leave and if you do you still aren't in any legal trouble
BPS: Hello, 911?
911: Yes, what's your emergency?
BPS: We had a gentlemen on the property who did not obey our store policy and we asked him to leave
911: Ok, where is he now?
BPS: He left
911: (silence)
BPS: Hello?
911: (click....tone)
So? They still have to ask you to leave, otherwise you're not breaking a law.
"Sir, if you are carrying a weapon, you have to right to enter this store."
You gotta love it... six pages of discussion about a situation that doesn't exist....
You gotta love it... six pages of discussion about a situation that doesn't exist....