If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Or then again it might be time to cash in on that “all enemies foriegn and DOMESTIC” part of our oath.
Assuming trump wins... and continues stacking the courts...
Published: 08/15/19
The chief executive officer of Walmart is calling for a debate on banning assault weapons amid pressure for the retailer to stop selling firearms.
"In the national conversation around gun safety, we're encouraged that broad support is emerging to strengthen background checks and to remove weapons from those who have been determined to pose an imminent danger," the prepared statement said. "The reauthorization of the assault weapons ban should be debated to determine its effectiveness in keeping weapons made for war out of the hands of mass murderers." ...
Can you elaborate? I was too young for the first one, and just assumed states had become more liberal as a whole.The difference between now and 1994 is that there are States and other jurisdictions that wouldn’t go along with a new ban, as well as lots of individuals. That’s what could lead to CW3
Can you elaborate? I was too young for the first one, and just assumed states had become more liberal as a whole.
It's not going to happen post Heller.
SCOTUS has been trying it's best not to hear cases with mags or rifles like the plague because the writing is on the wall for how thats going to go down, and the left leaning judges will either have to pretend they are mentally retarded in order to fail to understand it under scrutiny or betray their base by doing the obvious - which is over turning bans.
They'll hear it eventually.
The real problem is the red flag laws. Those are some major draconian pieces of shit and its going to have a lot of good people killed or hurt before a court figures out the shit needs to stop.
me, and most of the people i know...not big fans of diversity. italian and chinese food are about as diverse as we get.Diversify for a rainy day.
Worse with erpo my gut feeling is those f***s in Congress will turn it into "Lautenberg 2" and then there's no escaping that shit wrt federal pp status...
-Mike
I’m missing this - what would 2 look like? Like Lautenberg 1but not requiring a conviction?
Actually Lautenberg 1 does NOT require a conviction. It left it to each state to set the boundaries. MA set them as an exparte accusation, most of Free America requires a hearing with both parties present before you are stripped of your Constitutional right to self defense.I’m missing this - what would 2 look like? Like Lautenberg 1but not requiring a conviction?
Can you elaborate? I was too young for the first one, and just assumed states had become more liberal as a whole.
Gun Rights Watch: Tracking Gun Laws Across America
If you follow all these 2nd Ammendment Sanctuary movements going on in States that would otherwise be thought of as liberal, such as Washington, New Mexico and Illinois, you quickly see that the more conservative and less populated areas of these liberal states are refusing to enforce laws made in their Liberal state capitals. I assume conservative states like Alabama, Georgia,The Carolins New Hampshire, Idaho and Montana, would most likely also refuse a federal ban as a State.
Maybe I am naive, But just looking at this Shall Issue vs May issue vs Constitutional carry map over the last 25 years fills me with hope that things are changing for the better. A lot more people are invested in the Second Amendment than were 25 years ago.
... Some House Democrats will return early from the summer recess to advance gun control legislation, including a bill banning large ammunition clips....
... House Democrats are nonetheless ready to advance additional gun control measures. Nadler said he’ll take up a measure that would ban high-capacity ammunition magazines, which were used in a string of deadly mass shootings this summer.
The committee will vote to advance the ammunition ban measure on Sept. 4 and plans a Sept. 25 hearing on banning “military-style assault weapons,” Nadler said. ...
The problem is it takes a decade to move through the courts. Meanwhile, Trumps travel ban literally heard by courts and injunctions filed within daysGood. Needs to get hashed through court and ended.
The problem is it takes a decade to move through the courts. Meanwhile, Trumps travel ban literally heard by courts and injunctions filed within days
Good. Needs to get hashed through court and ended.
They're going to do that to millions of people? lol good luck with that.
Question, How did the first AWB survive for 10 years without being overturned on 2nd Amendment grounds?