My boys Doctor has asked. I simply answer no. Its no ones business if I have a sling shot or a bazooka in my safe. I refuse to entertain their question with any other information that like many others have said has no effect on my boys health care.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I am a PICU doc and did general pediatrics before that. As part of residency, we were taught to ask that question, and it makes sense. It's not out of arrogance, or "empowering children" (the office that said that clearly has their heads up their asses). It's about safety, plain and simple. The follow-up question is "are they locked up"? If the answer is yes, end of story, all good. If you reply with a polite "I'd prefer not to talk about it", that would be fine in my book, too. If they're laying around for kids to get ahold of, expect the conversation to last a bit longer. But if you you want to tell me "it's none of your damn business" and puff up your chest? Ok by me - help yourself to the door and don't let it hit you in the ass on the way out.
Every year WAY too many kids get hurt or killed playing with daddy or mommy's guns. I've seen it firsthand. The first time you see a child come in braindead from being accidentally shot by his younger brother you'll eat your words about getting all "offended" by the question. I couldn't care less if you're offended if it means that it'll help an irresponsible gun owner keep their children safe. Don't like it? I don't care.
When I bring my son to his own pediatrician, if they ask, I'll either say "no" or "yes, and they're locked up or on me" and be done with it. Why so many panties in a bunch over trying to keep children safe?? There are a lot of irresponsible people out there that need a reminder about their kids. That's it.
Oh it's for the children... sniff.......sniff.....cry.........cry.... Oh the children.... Thank god I have people like you to protect me from myself. What ever would I do without the protectionists like yourself who think they know better about what happens in my home then I do.
What........... you mean I'm not supposed to keep my pistol in the cookie jar... Don't look down. It's an awfully long fall from that high horse you're riding.
I am a PICU doc and did general pediatrics before that. As part of residency, we were taught to ask that question, and it makes sense. It's not out of arrogance, or "empowering children" (the office that said that clearly has their heads up their asses). It's about safety, plain and simple. The follow-up question is "are they locked up"? If the answer is yes, end of story, all good. If you reply with a polite "I'd prefer not to talk about it", that would be fine in my book, too. If they're laying around for kids to get ahold of, expect the conversation to last a bit longer. But if you you want to tell me "it's none of your damn business" and puff up your chest? Ok by me - help yourself to the door and don't let it hit you in the ass on the way out.
Every year WAY too many kids get hurt or killed playing with daddy or mommy's guns. I've seen it firsthand. The first time you see a child come in braindead from being accidentally shot by his younger brother you'll eat your words about getting all "offended" by the question. I couldn't care less if you're offended if it means that it'll help an irresponsible gun owner keep their children safe. Don't like it? I don't care.
When I bring my son to his own pediatrician, if they ask, I'll either say "no" or "yes, and they're locked up or on me" and be done with it. Why so many panties in a bunch over trying to keep children safe?? There are a lot of irresponsible people out there that need a reminder about their kids. That's it.
I am a PICU doc and did general pediatrics before that. As part of residency, we were taught to ask that question, and it makes sense. It's not out of arrogance, or "empowering children" (the office that said that clearly has their heads up their asses). It's about safety, plain and simple. The follow-up question is "are they locked up"? If the answer is yes, end of story, all good. If you reply with a polite "I'd prefer not to talk about it", that would be fine in my book, too. If they're laying around for kids to get ahold of, expect the conversation to last a bit longer. But if you you want to tell me "it's none of your damn business" and puff up your chest? Ok by me - help yourself to the door and don't let it hit you in the ass on the way out.
Every year WAY too many kids get hurt or killed playing with daddy or mommy's guns. I've seen it firsthand. The first time you see a child come in braindead from being accidentally shot by his younger brother you'll eat your words about getting all "offended" by the question. I couldn't care less if you're offended if it means that it'll help an irresponsible gun owner keep their children safe. Don't like it? I don't care.
When I bring my son to his own pediatrician, if they ask, I'll either say "no" or "yes, and they're locked up or on me" and be done with it. Why so many panties in a bunch over trying to keep children safe?? There are a lot of irresponsible people out there that need a reminder about their kids. That's it.
garandman said:Did they ask "Do you have a car seat? Wear seat belts? Know how to swim? Have prescription drugs in the home?" Car accidents are, by far the #1 cause of accidental death and injury of kids in the US and most other countries. In the US about 10,000 kids a year die from car crashes and about 500 are injured per day.
Well then, in that vein.If that question offends you, you are WAY too sensitive, and sounds like you need someone to pat you on the bum and tell you you're the best daddy ever. With all your whining, you're sounding a lot like the liberals I'm pretty sure you make fun of.
Well then, in that vein.
How's your wife in the sack?
If that question offends you, you are WAY too sensitive, and sounds like you need someone to pat you on the bum and tell you you're the best doctor ever.
I am a PICU doc and did general pediatrics before that. As part of residency, we were taught to ask that question, and it makes sense. It's not out of arrogance, or "empowering children" (the office that said that clearly has their heads up their asses). It's about safety, plain and simple. The follow-up question is "are they locked up"? If the answer is yes, end of story, all good. If you reply with a polite "I'd prefer not to talk about it", that would be fine in my book, too. If they're laying around for kids to get ahold of, expect the conversation to last a bit longer. But if you you want to tell me "it's none of your damn business" and puff up your chest? Ok by me - help yourself to the door and don't let it hit you in the ass on the way out.
Every year WAY too many kids get hurt or killed playing with daddy or mommy's guns. I've seen it firsthand. The first time you see a child come in braindead from being accidentally shot by his younger brother you'll eat your words about getting all "offended" by the question. I couldn't care less if you're offended if it means that it'll help an irresponsible gun owner keep their children safe. Don't like it? I don't care.
When I bring my son to his own pediatrician, if they ask, I'll either say "no" or "yes, and they're locked up or on me" and be done with it. Why so many panties in a bunch over trying to keep children safe?? There are a lot of irresponsible people out there that need a reminder about their kids. That's it.
Sorry for resurrecting an old thread, but this appeared over at Lew Rockwell's blog:
Without a Shot
Action #2, #14, #16, #17, #21, and #22 utilize the national healthcare system
What think y'all? Tinfoil hattery?
Evadd said:I am a PICU doc and did general pediatrics before that. As part of residency, we were taught to ask that question, and it makes sense. It's not out of arrogance, or "empowering children" (the office that said that clearly has their heads up their asses). It's about safety, plain and simple.
Is the question about safety, or about "removing guns from homes and communities”? (Pediatrics, 11/2012).
/When I bring my son to his own pediatrician, if they ask, I'll either say "no" or "yes, and they're locked up or on me" and be done with it. Why so many panties in a bunch over trying to keep children safe?? There are a lot of irresponsible people out there that need a reminder about their kids. That's it.
It's a free country, but when folks don't store or care for their guns, IMHO it's not helping the cause.Store guns so they are not accessible to unauthorized persons.
Many factors must be considered when deciding where and how to store guns. A person's particular situation will be a major part of the consideration. Dozens of gun storage devices, as well as locking devices that attach directly to the gun, are available. However, mechanical locking devices, like the mechanical safeties built into guns, can fail and should not be used as a substitute for safe gun handling and the observance of all gun safety rules.
I am a PICU doc and did general pediatrics before that. As part of residency, we were taught to ask that question, and it makes sense. It's not out of arrogance, or "empowering children" (the office that said that clearly has their heads up their asses). It's about safety, plain and simple. The follow-up question is "are they locked up"? If the answer is yes, end of story, all good. If you reply with a polite "I'd prefer not to talk about it", that would be fine in my book, too. If they're laying around for kids to get ahold of, expect the conversation to last a bit longer. But if you you want to tell me "it's none of your damn business" and puff up your chest? Ok by me - help yourself to the door and don't let it hit you in the ass on the way out.
Every year WAY too many kids get hurt or killed playing with daddy or mommy's guns. I've seen it firsthand. The first time you see a child come in braindead from being accidentally shot by his younger brother you'll eat your words about getting all "offended" by the question. I couldn't care less if you're offended if it means that it'll help an irresponsible gun owner keep their children safe. Don't like it? I don't care.
When I bring my son to his own pediatrician, if they ask, I'll either say "no" or "yes, and they're locked up or on me" and be done with it. Why so many panties in a bunch over trying to keep children safe?? There are a lot of irresponsible people out there that need a reminder about their kids. That's it.
My tin foil hat is on today (keeps the snow off) but it is a fact that the Soviets used "philosophical intoxication" as a method to oppress those that did not agree and the whole Soviet mental health system was set up to support the suppression of thought and actions. That is why this whole unrelated questioning concerns me and the push to make "mental health" the standard by which rights can be granted. While the below steps to communist take over is simply read into the Congressional Record, and may simply reflect an opinion, it does seem strangely prophetic:
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat]. 39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
The follow-up question is "are they locked up"? If the answer is yes, end of story, all good. If you reply with a polite "I'd prefer not to talk about it", that would be fine in my book, too. If they're laying around for kids to get ahold of, expect the conversation to last a bit longer.
It's a free country, but when folks don't store or care for their guns, IMHO it's not helping the cause.
Gun-proof your kids people.