MSL are a bunch of morons if they think their injunction is nationwide. It's not. It's limited to the circuit it was in.
good to know, I'll be following that case regardless now
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
MSL are a bunch of morons if they think their injunction is nationwide. It's not. It's limited to the circuit it was in.
now obviously I wasn't carrying because I had to cross army corps of engineering property to get to the cape, but if I had I certainly would have turned around immediately and called the cops on myself
MSL are a bunch of morons if they think their injunction is nationwide. It's not. It's limited to the circuit it was in.
The Idaho district court did not stop there. After determining that Ms. Morris is likely to prevail following an “evidentiary hearing or trial,” the district court prohibited the Corps from enforcing its regulation “as to law-abiding individuals possessing functional firearms on Corps-administered public lands for the purpose of self-defense.” That means that, on Corps recreational sites from California to Connecticut and from Minnesota to Mississippi, Second Amendment rights prevail
maybe the sign was a piss poor way to tell people there is not deer or duck hunting on the "posted" property?
now obviously I wasn't carrying because I had to cross army corps of engineering property to get to the cape
Sounds like 100% of the people visiting the cape this summer.
it was for a whole neighborhood, thats what stood out to me... very odd
it didn't say no hunting or no trespassing, no firearms allowed. I hope they get robbed and the cops can only go help if unarmed
- - - Updated - - -
my girlfriend even offered to take a picture but I figured we would get arrested for something somehow, should have risked it for NES
I pick my battles. ... so yes exactly hahaSo you're a whipped sheep, is that what you're saying?
Forty posts and this thread has yet to devolve into a "Do my gun rights trump your property rights" debate yet.
Holy crap, hell is frozen over.
Only if it's liftedSo are we saying I cannot drive my Jeep into the neighborhood if I have rifes in the rack?Sent from the blind
I turned around immediately so i didn't trample anyone's property rightsForty posts and this thread has yet to devolve into a "Do my gun rights trump your property rights" debate yet.Holy crap, hell is frozen over.
http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/...aho-woman-defeats-obama's-top-lawyers-on-guns
I would like to know if this is true or not, I do a lot of hunting/fishing on Army Corps Land and never knew about a weapons ban.
Me either! Damn, I never even knew that was technicly prohibited! What a bunch of bs! Like you point out, we can unknowingly violate laws every single day because of how many of these silly things exist.
So are we saying I cannot drive my Jeep into the neighborhood if I have rifes in the rack?
Sent from the blind
Or take it out with your car.Just get some tools, and take the sign down. Problem solved! ;-)
http://www.mountainstateslegal.org/...aho-woman-defeats-obama's-top-lawyers-on-guns
I would like to know if this is true or not, I do a lot of hunting/fishing on Army Corps Land and never knew about a weapons ban.
Such a scary sign! Flowers and a white picket fence.
that would be the one, it was scary, I started sweating, I actually had to turn around after the gate... still considering turning myself in
7600 ac to protect a bird
There's a good chance that road isn't even private. The house values in there range from about $2M up to $25M and it wouldn't be the first time a bunch of people in a neighborhood like that got together and put up signage to make it look private. There's a similar situation in Concord right across from the Old North Bridge.