3D printed guns

MachineHead said:
The kid sounds like an idiot. He’s taking just to hear himself talk. He makes inaccurate remarks left and right.
Click to expand...

You're right. You know it and I know it. The problem is - as my wife said when I was laughing at Blumenthal's obviously idiotic remarks the other night - the general public does NOT know that the drivel that comes out of their mouths is drivel. The general public BELIEVES this crap. And they vote. The general public put our legislators in office. It's our friends, neighbors and fellow citizens who support these these clowns and a**h***s who are taking away our rights.

Yeah, admit it, you've got at least one closet liberal friend who's scared of guns. Or who says "I support the second amendment but...". We all do. And the media is swamped with bullshit about guns. Fricking sharks with fricking lazer beams.

Nobody, but nobody wants to stand up and say "I'm okay with kids dying if it means I keep my guns". So the politicians spew crap night and day. Anderson brings on Hogg as a "survivor" to talk about "ghost guns" as some sort of expert. Phhhhbbbtt. This kid knows nothing. And he lies. Then he says that the NRA gave 30 million dollars to Trump that came from the Russians. And another seed is sown to the mass public.

Meanwhile in the real world I've got another box of 80% lowers sitting on a shelf in my workshop. It's legal right now. And I'm getting to the point where I'm not sure I care what law they pass any more - because I know what their goals are - and they're not in my best interests.
 
I wish we could prove how much money and influence Bloomberg has on all this in a manner easily understood by the public. If the public knew one guy was throwing tens of millions at an issue and having the entire political-media complex whore itself for every penny, I think it would change things.
 
amm5061 said:
You already have to register what you build. That's f***ing stupid and will do nothing.
Click to expand...
True, but

(a) You do not need a MA license to mfgr, since no such thing exists (It will under Linksy's bill)

(b) You are not required to place a serial number on what you build
 
allen-1 said:
You're right. You know it and I know it. The problem is - as my wife said when I was laughing at Blumenthal's obviously idiotic remarks the other night - the general public does NOT know that the drivel that comes out of their mouths is drivel. The general public BELIEVES this crap. And they vote. .
Click to expand...

I disagree. Most likely aren't even paying attention. I think a bigger problem is that the general public just doesn't care or is ambivalent about constitutional issues, wether it involves guns or civil rights, might as well be mandarin chinese to the average smoe, particularly in this section of the country... so as a result antis like crapenthal here get a "soft pass" because there's not enough outrage about their bullshit.

-Mike
 
The more hysteria and the more they try to bring laws to fight cody wilson the more they are:
A. Popularizing his cause, he becomes the proverbial david against goliath (and American's love the outlaw/underdog), they in turn get painted as state sponsored bullies.
B. The more they become unwitting participants in cody's long game. That is to say, in the end, he wants to force the conversation to a point where the states power is ultimately exposed, i.e. one where "contraband will be only a notional concept, because enforcement will require policing ideas and blueprints, not simply goods."

This swift overreaction shows truly how weak the state's control is. They're panicking literally over nothing. It's too Perfect. It's embarrassing really. They have to get up there and lie to the public to get support to pass these new laws.

I read a quote on a youtube vid about this issue that If America is going to go full socialist, then we really need every home in America to have one of Cody's machines.

A rifle behind every blade of grass.
 
Sometimes you just gotta meme


38256510_2177419029168848_691768585407692800_n.jpg
 
Johnnyh said:
The more hysteria and the more they try to bring laws to fight cody wilson the more they are:
A. Popularizing his cause, he becomes the proverbial david against goliath (and American's love the outlaw/underdog), they in turn get painted as state sponsored bullies.
B. The more they become unwitting participants in cody's long game. That is to say, in the end, he wants to force the conversation to a point where the states power is ultimately exposed, i.e. one where "contraband will be only a notional concept, because enforcement will require policing ideas and blueprints, not simply goods."

This swift overreaction shows truly how weak the state's control is. They're panicking literally over nothing. It's too Perfect. It's embarrassing really. They have to get up there and lie to the public to get support to pass these new laws.

I read a quote on a youtube vid about this issue that If America is going to go full socialist, then we really need every home in America to have one of Cody's machines.

A rifle behind every blade of grass.
Click to expand...

It is interesting to see them fall right in line with Cody's plans... it is working too well, and the idiots panicking don't even know they are being manipulated.

I've heard Cody speak in person a few times. I don't even understand half the stuff he's talking about. He's a high-level genius and fooling idiots with an IQ of 85. Love the guy (but in a nonsexual way).
 
Prepper said:
It is interesting to see them fall right in line with Cody's plans... it is working too well, and the idiots panicking don't even know they are being manipulated.

I've heard Cody speak in person a few times. I don't even understand half the stuff he's talking about. He's a high-level genius and fooling idiots with an IQ of 85. Love the guy (but in a nonsexual way).
Click to expand...

The fun part about this is it might ultimately induce moonbats to shit on the 1st amendment and might cause a few of them to have a conflict of faith or something, lmao... because at some point or another, someone is going to come out and say "well, if you allow the gov to regulate this speech "cuz guns" then they can virtually invent any reason to regulate any
speech that they want, without having to deal with pesky things like well defined, and cordoned off corner cases against free speech. "

-Mike
 
drgrant said:
The fun part about this is it might ultimately induce moonbats to shit on the 1st amendment and might cause a few of them to have a conflict of faith or something, lmao... because at some point or another, someone is going to come out and say "well, if you allow the gov to regulate this speech "cuz guns" then they can virtually invent any reason to regulate any
speech that they want, without having to deal with pesky things like well defined, and cordoned off corner cases against free speech. "

-Mike
Click to expand...

nah, moonbats and logic? lol. People in the center are hopefully paying attention. That's what matters.
 
Boris said:
nah, moonbats and logic? lol. People in the center are hopefully paying attention. That's what matters.
Click to expand...

I realize most of them don't have it, but I think the mental gymnastics might cause some of them to have a nervous breakdown. You can't urge the .gov to regulate "gun plans" or "cad files about guns" and then in the next breath be going "well that doesn't apply when we want to say bad things about the president!!! ZOMG!" etc.

Then again these are the same people who didn't say boo when the dems stole the nomination away from their pet Bernie, either. So perhaps its wishful thinking.

-Mike
 
Has anyone ever been shot with one?

They are going to use this has an excuse to ban 80% lowers and such. By the time they are done we will be lucky to get any firearm parts delivered to our homes.

Bob
 
drgrant said:
The fun part about this is it might ultimately induce moonbats to shit on the 1st amendment and might cause a few of them to have a conflict of faith or something, lmao... because at some point or another, someone is going to come out and say "well, if you allow the gov to regulate this speech "cuz guns" then they can virtually invent any reason to regulate any
speech that they want, without having to deal with pesky things like well defined, and cordoned off corner cases against free speech. "
Click to expand...
These ARE the same moonbats who tried to get "hacking" software declared a munition, crypto code barred from the Internet under the same regs they went after Cody for, etc. SAME MOONBATS. This all went down in the Clinton administration well before 9/11 and "OMG ter'rists" too. The 1st A to them is only OK if it's about crowds of their party's voters armed with sticks and rocks, books they support, and keeping religion sequestered. I'm not saying the other end of the statist spectrum is better - statists gonna state and all - but the hypocrisy galls me.
 
MachineHead said:
I don’t know, but I’m hoping it does more.

Around 4:20 the owning of the biased reporter says a lot.


View: https://youtu.be/KatYW_gN4j8
Click to expand...


I just listened to this whole thing. WOW!

This guy is not only brilliant at what he has done and is doing, but he is a solid thinker on his feet, and knows EXACTLY what to say to this dink of an interviewer. He is awesome! Just wow.
 
strangenh said:
These ARE the same moonbats who tried to get "hacking" software declared a munition, crypto code barred from the Internet under the same regs they went after Cody for, etc. SAME MOONBATS. This all went down in the Clinton administration well before 9/11 and "OMG ter'rists" too. The 1st A to them is only OK if it's about crowds of their party's voters armed with sticks and rocks, books they support, and keeping religion sequestered. I'm not saying the other end of the statist spectrum is better - statists gonna state and all - but the hypocrisy galls me.
Click to expand...

I don't dispute that many of them are, I just know that there are many that aren't (eg otherwise ambivalent about guns etc) and it'll be pretty funny when they shit a brick realizing that they're basically pushing for their own demise.

-Mike
 
drgrant said:
I realize most of them don't have it, but I think the mental gymnastics might cause some of them to have a nervous breakdown. You can't urge the .gov to regulate "gun plans" or "cad files about guns" and then in the next breath be going "well that doesn't apply when we want to say bad things about the president!!! ZOMG!" etc.

Then again these are the same people who didn't say boo when the dems stole the nomination away from their pet Bernie, either. So perhaps its wishful thinking.

-Mike
Click to expand...

I think you're underestimating them again. These are the same people:

zW9Pk10.jpg
 
Kylep427 said:
fair enough, but what if I only sent one part, then a buddy sent another part, then someone sent another, and so on till all the parts are there? No laws broken, not a gun, just pieces. That would be awesome! ...
Click to expand...

Robert Anton Wilson once wrote of screwing with The Man's mind by getting co-conspirators in different cities to send a sequence of unsigned postcards which said something like:
  • NO
  • ONE
  • ESCAPES
  • THE
  • NOTICE
  • OF
  • THE
  • BAVARIAN
  • ILLUMINATI
 

Similar threads

3d printing BROs
Replies
12
Views
462
pastera
pastera
Cleaning your guns
2 3
Replies
66
Views
2K
Buck F
Buck F
Correct way to get guns back from police?
Replies
16
Views
663
appraiser
appraiser
Nashua police say man made gun with 3-D printed parts
2
Replies
32
Views
844
KBCraig
KBCraig
Migrants can carry guns
Replies
23
Views
726
KBCraig
KBCraig
Back
Top Bottom