AHM
NES Member
That's not proof against all defenses.
It's nature's way of telling you that the site is made out of Very Fake News.P.S.> I despise these websites that post opinion pieces without any means of public comment.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS July Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE***
17-year-old arrested in killing of 2 people in Kenosha
- Thread starter Toast
- Start date
kevin9
NES Member
Heck, there are posters here who've bought and sold the prosecutor's claim.
SpaceCritter
NES Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2011
- Messages
- 634
- Likes
- 531
AND she is just not important. The follow/followers ratio is almost 2.0Written by a Trump deranged supporter of Biden, pretending that she is not anti 2A from the jump as she condescends to rural gun owners.
P.S.> I despise these websites that post opinion pieces without any means of public comment.
MaverickNH
NES Member
Yes, folks need to deal with accepting the verdict and still maintain their position on guns and systemic racism. Yet, more Democrats approved of the verdict (31%, MorningConsult) than believe firearms laws are About Right or a Too Strict (19%, Pew Apr 2021). Leftist riots/looting/burning has more than a few Moderate/Conservative Democrats reconsidering armed self-defense.
Gun ownership is not a rarity among women and POCs but…
…is still largely a Conservative/Republican thing.
chuckules
NES Member
Pew Research Center doing…Pew Pew research?
meh
NES Member
Recent election-related polling performance has forced me to attach a pro-left bias to polls conducted by traditional methods. I think this is a function of participation and, to some extent, of left-wing browbeating rather than to the poll construction itself. If the approval ratings for Biden are polling in the low 40's by traditional methods, I'm thinking the correct number is probably in the high 20's or low 30's. If 39% disapprove of the Rittenhouse verdict when polled by traditional methods, I'm thinking the real number is probably somewhere in the 20's.
Grosskruetz has most of the use of his injured arm. He lost a lot of his bicep but not all of it. He can move it in all ways but his strength has been reduced.
namedpipes
NES Member
(she's guilty, BTW)
Fixxah
NES Member
Is a trust protected?
namedpipes
NES Member
Naughty Librarian
2024
2024
allen-1
NES Member
Leftist Arizona State U. groups demand Kyle Rittenhouse be booted from campus | The College Fix
But it's tough to oust a student who's enrolled ONLINE …
www.thecollegefix.com
When I was studying AMOK, they sold a shirt that said "If you blink, you'll die in the dark"I like this shirt better:
![[grin]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/041.gif "Grin [grin]")
This is to be expected from the Coddled, Indoctrinated, Communist Bastards. These are the same kind of Shit Stirrers that were students in the 60's. Of Course now these Bastards are being indoctrinated by those same Shit Stirrers.Leftist Arizona State U. groups demand Kyle Rittenhouse be booted from campus | The College Fix
But it's tough to oust a student who's enrolled ONLINE …
MaverickNH
NES Member
Eugene Volokh, in his blog Volokh Conspiracy, is “…researching the cases dealing with self-defense rights of people who go to a place armed, knowing that it's likely to be dangerous…” to address the subject of self-defense when claimants could be accused of “probably looking for trouble.”
reason.com
This is, of course, relates to the Rittenhouse case, where KR went to a place “he had no right to be, with an AR rifle, looking for trouble.”
My perspective posted: “If government withholds resources to maintain order of law in otherwise previously safe areas, or is implicit in the violence itself, can going to those areas become “looking for trouble”, and disable any positive self-defense claim?
ACLED observed: “Approximately 94% of all pro-BLM demonstrations have been peaceful, with 6% involving reports of violence, clashes with police, vandalism, looting, or other destructive activity.
In the remaining 6%, it is not clear who instigated the violent or destructive activity.” [Presence of far-right at these small number of sites where violence erupted is inferred as a cause]
A Year of Racial Justice Protests: Key Trends in Demonstrations Supporting the BLM Movement | ACLED
Wouldn’t entering any of the 3000+ locations in the US that saw 11000+ demonstrations May 2020-2021 be “almost certainly not looking for trouble” with a 94% statistical justification?”
Husband, Wife, Brothel, Knife: Another Case on Carrying a Gun When “Expecting Trouble”
I've been researching the cases dealing with self-defense rights of people who go to a place armed, knowing that it's...
reason.com
This is, of course, relates to the Rittenhouse case, where KR went to a place “he had no right to be, with an AR rifle, looking for trouble.”
My perspective posted: “If government withholds resources to maintain order of law in otherwise previously safe areas, or is implicit in the violence itself, can going to those areas become “looking for trouble”, and disable any positive self-defense claim?
ACLED observed: “Approximately 94% of all pro-BLM demonstrations have been peaceful, with 6% involving reports of violence, clashes with police, vandalism, looting, or other destructive activity.
In the remaining 6%, it is not clear who instigated the violent or destructive activity.” [Presence of far-right at these small number of sites where violence erupted is inferred as a cause]
A Year of Racial Justice Protests: Key Trends in Demonstrations Supporting the BLM Movement | ACLED
Wouldn’t entering any of the 3000+ locations in the US that saw 11000+ demonstrations May 2020-2021 be “almost certainly not looking for trouble” with a 94% statistical justification?”
I heard it was low. . .
MagGus1820
NES Member
More evidence for the defamation lawsuits?Leftist Arizona State U. groups demand Kyle Rittenhouse be booted from campus | The College Fix
But it's tough to oust a student who's enrolled ONLINE …
Chevy 2 65
NES Member
AHM
NES Member
He doesn't seem to have addressed whetherEugene Volokh, in his blog Volokh Conspiracy, is “…researching the cases dealing with self-defense rights of people who go to a place armed, knowing that it's likely to be dangerous…” to address the subject of self-defense when claimants could be accused of “probably looking for trouble.”
Husband, Wife, Brothel, Knife: Another Case on Carrying a Gun When “Expecting Trouble”
I've been researching the cases dealing with self-defense rights of people who go to a place armed, knowing that it's...
by the time of the 2010 Arkansas Criminal Code,
the legislature had superseded the precedent from that 1915 case.
SpaceCritter
NES Member
Dadstoys
NES Member
I like to think i'm fairly well trained with blades , but if I see that dude coming , I quit.
MagGus1820
NES Member
Good video, crosses over a bit with the GA case:
widnerkj
NES Member
Or Grand Canyon university
Cipher
NES Member
Fixxah
NES Member
It will keel.
CatSnoutSoup
NES Member
Hillsdale College would probably let him teach a course in riot disincentivizing through the use of ballistic counter-skateboard technology.
Remember when that NBC reporter person got busted following the jury and they denied he worked for them and that nothing like that happened?
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SVd3p9wJJVo
I know you will all be shocked to find out, but they lied.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SVd3p9wJJVo
I know you will all be shocked to find out, but they lied.
