Best guess would be the "Communications Manager"!!
Who's that?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Best guess would be the "Communications Manager"!!
Who's that?
I don't see any reason to assume that the GOAL employees or points of contact with the public are in any way responsible for the content or lack thereof in any publication or communication. Some people know what is going on, and some people are making the decisions about how GOAL should operate. I don't know who is deciding what, but I bet that the ultimate decision makers are unlikely to be the folks working for a paycheck.
Best guess would be the "Communications Manager"!!
I'm willing to bet that the BOD 'directs' things to the GOAL staff more than 4 times per year. Those BOD members that actually have access to the passing fad that is email also get the Friday News, since they are GOAL members.Since I just learned that the BOD only meets 4x/year (I always thought they met monthly), I'm certain that the BOD does not direct exact content to specific Friday blasts as that would require meetings and votes on a much more regular basis.
In light of the recent threads/revelations, who besides a board member would have done this? Seriously.So I can't guess (because it could be one of multiple people) who made a decision to NOT include this BOD meeting in the latest Email.
It might have been a slip-up or it might have been intentional . . . I don't know.
I suppose someone could ask on Thursday if they thought it was that important.
Ah! Thanks Adam. 7:30 everyone, not 6:30
I believe the note in TOM says it's at GOAL HQ. That is incorrect, it's at Braintree R&P
...Why in the world would TOM report that the meeting is at GOAL HQ??? Certain folks on the BOD may feel that NES doesn't represent the majority of GOAL, but in this instance, members of GOAL who rely on TOM instead of NES are bound to be SOL....
So the meetings in the past have been mentioned in the Friday news letter but for some reason this particular meeting was left out. Was that by design or just a slip up? Who sent out the Friday news?
Best guess would be the "Communications Manager"!!
Who's that?
"GOAL C.M."
I don't see any reason to assume that the GOAL employees or points of contact with the public are in any way responsible for the content or lack thereof in any publication or communication. Some people know what is going on, and some people are making the decisions about how GOAL should operate. I don't know who is deciding what, but I bet that the ultimate decision makers are unlikely to be the folks working for a paycheck.
THIS. You're talking about a guy who runs their day to day network...not someone who has a say in what to print or not to print. For my money, they haven't got a clue as to what the BOD decides to print or not. They're simply instructed what to put int he newsletter!
Why the shocked smiley? He's the source of virtually all the electronic communications sent out by GOAL.
The BOD meeting notice has been part of every Friday News that I haven't thrown out yet.
That sort of decision on content is typically not made by a communications manager, but by the B.O.D. itself.
If you're trying to imply that it was the GOAL CM that decided to leave it out and not someone on (or close to) the B.O.D., then I think you're wrong, and I think you know it.
No kidding.Don't forget, MikeS and GOAL and Jon also have logins and post on here.
Please do not answer them with speculation. If you know for a fact, share that with us but if you're guessing, please keep it to yourself as the waters are muddy enough already. 'I think' and 'my understanding is' just confuses the issue even more.
So LenS should not post anything anymore, is that what you are trying to get through.
- Braintree R&P is feeding the GOAL BOD Members at the earlier time. The public (and even club members) are NOT invited to dinner!!
GOAL BOD does NOT rely on NES, TOM or the weekly Email Blast from GOAL for their BOD Meeting notice.
Does that seem like a reasonable thing to ask?
According to some it's completely unreasonable.
Stupidity has never been in short supply here, sadly.Pretty short sighted if the reason not to support GOAL is because they don't sponsor a State shooting team, IMO.
Pretty short sighted if the reason not to support GOAL is because they don't sponsor a State shooting team, IMO.
Stupidity has never been in short supply here, sadly.
perhaps it is, choosing to support (or not support) GOAL is a personal choice, and if I choose to be a "single issue voter", then so be it. I'd be willing to be that at least on a political level, 90% of the people on this forum are single issue voters.
Rifle marksmanship is what I do. I teach juniors how to shoot (rifle, smallbore, and as they get a bit bigger, highpower), and personally compete on a national level.
it's kind of sad, actually. on the line for the National Team Trophy match, seeing state flags all the way up and down, MA curiously missing. I'd like to see that changed, but no one's willing to fly the flag on a state thats turned its back on us.