June4th
NES Member
I've reached the point where I don't give a shit about any of this. Jack.
Better that than this: http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/2nd_Amend/deaths_in_merced.htm
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I've reached the point where I don't give a shit about any of this. Jack.
The second he gives her access.. he has committed a storage violation. However, if she "somehow" gained access to the gun to save her life, she and he would most likely be OK legally... but at that point who would really care.
Put trigger locks on the pistols (in the safe) and leave a loaded shotgun for the kid.
I've reached the point where I don't give a shit about any of this. Jack.
I've reached the point where I don't give a shit about any of this. Jack.
I would not only want everyone who is going to use the gun licensed, but also trained beyond a basic safety course. If your wife really has no interest in guns and no training it may not really be very helpful for her to have access to the guns since she doesn't know how to use them.
In my opinion, a modern striker based handgun doesn't require much training to be able to use in close quarters. My wife took a basic safety course when I took it to get my LTC, and then I took her to the range with me a few times. It's pretty basic, pop the magazine in, pull the slide back, aim in the general direction of the threat and pull the trigger. If an attacker is in the same room as you are, you don't need to have great aim to hit them.
Just to throw another curve ball, the prosecution will have a difficult time proving that licensed spouse gave unlicensed spouse access. One spouse cannot be forced to testify against the other in a storage violation case.
Unfortunately, licensed spouse probably confessed.
Better that than this: http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/2nd_Amend/deaths_in_merced.htm
In my opinion, a modern striker based handgun doesn't require much training to be able to use in close quarters. It's pretty basic, pop the magazine in, pull the slide back, aim in the general direction of the threat and pull the trigger.
The police aren't going to tell you that and the Reid Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques course is very effective. Having taken it many years ago and watched a veteran officer volunteer to be interrogated, I'm convinced that the "interviewer" (Sgt. Bill Brooks, Norwood PD - I found my class notes, pretty sure it's the same guy that is now Chief) could have convinced the volunteer officer to confess to murdering his mother while his mother was standing beside him!! Very effective indeed. I took that class back in 1980 and am still very impressed by how difficult it is to avoid sounding guilty even if you are innocent!
Best response if the police are asking you about *anything* is to STFU and only ask for a lawyer. Nobody ever talked themselves into less trouble.that's just scary, hopefully i never have to be interrogated. i was under the impression my wife was covered in the home guess shes getting her ltc ASAP.
Best response if the police are asking you about *anything* is to STFU and only ask for a lawyer. Nobody ever talked themselves into less trouble.
Although theoretically what you stated sounds good, please explain why in self-defense situations (hold-ups, etc.) if the clerk shoots at the perp they frequently miss. Also how do you explain the Diallo case where cops wrongfully shot this poor man, fired 41 bullets and only 19 struck him in close quarters. [I thought the number of shots was higher, but this is what Wikipedia states and I'm not going to waste my time searching further.]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Amadou_Diallo
Reality seems not to track logic here.
Best response if the police are asking you about *anything* is to STFU and only ask for a lawyer. Nobody ever talked themselves into less trouble.