one-eyed Jack
Manufacturer
He needs to be set up for a blind date with the Hogg guy. Jack.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Buffalo Bill songJeremy Brum looks like a cool, smart dude.
View attachment 470169
And watch out, this ladykiller is the Associate Chief Justice at UMass Amherst Student Government Association.
Can we pack the helicopters instead? with people like him?
They don’t have quite the same effect though!! I don’t care how much a helo costs per hour, I want commies falling fromI'm a skinflint, through and through. Helicopter rides are expensive. I'm a big fan of rope, it's reusable.
Group rates.I'm a skinflint, through and through. Helicopter rides are expensive. I'm a big fan of rope, it's reusable.
why do you blame him? he only repeats what he had studied.
it is quite a classic narrative, one below. specifically, the part of "no individual right to own firearms". they do teach it in all the schools. any narrative, repeated sufficient amount of times becomes the reality, and it is his reality, and he believes in it, fully.
"Before the decision, there was no individual right to own firearms. The very words of the Second Amendment, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,” makes absolutely no mention of an individual’s right to bear arms, and every other Supreme Court case only considered the right of militias to own firearms. The purpose of this amendment, as affirmed by historians, was to stop the federal government from getting rid of state militias. The Second Amendment only granted the right to own a firearm to those involved in local militia, which would now be the National Guard."
He needs to be set up for a blind date with the Hogg guy. Jack.
A lot of bandwidth in this bad boy,Group rates.
they are right about saying 'discourse distracts from our ability'. the path is to eradicate the discourse, then the source of discourse.
same as it always was and same as it will always be...
again, it is wrong to blame youngsters for having this opinion. it is quite obvious, at certain age, that the root of all world evil is stupid stubborness of those older people who got some resources to refuse sharing all that wealth with those who do deserve it (perhaps) better but do not have any, yet, for non-important reasons.
I was fed a steady diet of leftist bull at UMass in the 90's. I pretty much ignored alot of it. Most of it, I thought was silly. Some made sense to me at the time. Then I lived in CA and saw the end result, it was at that time I pretty much ran from any lefty ideas with haste. They just can't leave people alone, have to ruin everything out there. Sucks cuz the weather is real nice, so they got that at least.
90`s were different. you were allowed to have an opinion back then and not be immediately cancelled. open your mouth now - and you can kiss your whole future career good-bye.
those kids today do not really have an option other than to comply with the accepted conformity, and the conformity is quite settled by now.
damn, even back in 2001 we still talked at work. no one talks now, anymore.
The Daily Collegian was a joke even when I was at UMass in the mid-late 2000s. I've never met anyone who read it.
2024 will be too late if they do that.
We the well regulated militia of the United States...Incel with un-elected power to destroy the lives of male students he sees as surrogates for those who bullied him in middle and high school.
This is exactly the type you don't want on a police force or access to any political power.
Dropped this comment on him.
The author conveniently leaves out every word or phrase that negates his false argument. He does validate the view that the anti-gun crowd believes that only the gov’t (and criminals) can have guns.
Left out? The operative phrase in the 2A: the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
How can any person claiming to be educated come to the conclusion that “The People” means individuals every place it appears in the Constitution except in the 2nd amendment?
The first clause is not a limiting clause on the second.
Here is a great analogy: “A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed.”
What is protected? Breakfast? Or the right of the people to keep and eat food regardless whether it is for breakfast or not?
As for misusing stats? Approx 67% of all deaths in which a gun was the tool used were suicides. These people would simply find another method.
Of intentional homicides in which a firearm was used, 80+% are gang and drug related and most of those occur in area that already have the strictest gun laws in the country.
Fact: An unarmed woman is 10X more likely to be raped than a a woman armed with a gun or knife. (The UK bans both)
Anyone who opposes individual gun ownership and carry must then be considered pro-rape.
When only the police and criminals have guns, the line between law and outlaw disappears.
My son was considering going to Umass Lowell.UMass and that whole area has always been hyper liberal, the difference in the past was at least the school was cheap/affordable and it had a lousy reputation to go along with its antifa style Marxist teachers, now parents are paying top dollar. But an article like this from there is absolutely zero surprise.
No it’s not. You are supposed to leave them hanging until they rot off as a warning to others.I'm a skinflint, through and through. Helicopter rides are expensive. I'm a big fan of rope, it's reusable.
Not at all necessarily.If the 2A is collective in leads to the absurd conclusion that the government needs the constitution in order to have the right to arm its minions.