Three Men Arrested for Illegally Carrying and Possessing Firearm in Worcester

If the firearm is not functional, therefore, not capable of firing a projectile, do they drop the weapons charge?
Not usually, because they know the threat of facing a court that might convict for a non-crime is a real risk, raises the defendant's legal fees, and increases the prosecutions bargaining power.

The gun would also have to be incapable of discharging without the non-defined "minor adjustment or repair'.
 
No, but you do need at least an FID. Not entirely sure how/if that impacts black powder and those components. Not that it matters in this case.


It is not unlawful to possess powder, cap, and ball for a BP arm in the PRM

https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXX/Chapter140/Section129C

The language talks about long arms, but
commomwealth v. jefferson gives primitive handguns a pass.

This does not apply to 209 primers for inline muzzle loaders.
 
There was a case in Boston a few years ago (A few could be a decade) where two different people were convicted of the same murder - with the prosecution arguing completely different theories of what happened in each of the two cases.
When nobody fesses up they'll charge all occupants and let the da sort it out.
Setting up a classic Prisoner's Dilemma scenario.
 
There was a case in Boston a few years ago (A few could be a decade) where two different people were convicted of the same murder - with the prosecution arguing completely different theories of what happened in each of the two cases.

Setting up a classic Prisoner's Dilemma scenario.
Luckily for society,
most prospective Prisoners drop out of college before taking Game Theory.
 
Back
Top Bottom