D
Deleted member 12999
So we're supposed to play rock, paper, scissors, at a gunfight? When the 2nd AMD is pretty clear? Got it.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Like I've said many times, I believe in the Con, ALL the time. Not just when it suits my needs. I'll try this again, please don't bash till it's over:
The Con. says that the state has a right to pas laws. The body that passes these laws must be made up of US, people. If the state passes a bogus law, then the poeple US fight it in court. We go to court, appeal (laid out in Con.) and it goes alllll the way up to SJC in MA. Of Supreme Court. There they decide if its Constitutional or "lawful". I didn't decide this process.
So to me, if SOMEHOW something was passed and went through ALL of the processes legitimately, then I'd follow it UNLESS it was something obvious such as "murder all people wearing purple". That is why the guys who just sit home buy ammo and dig trenches aren't helping anyone. I swore to uphold the WHOLE Con. not jsut certain pieces.
NOW: We have the Natural Rights portion. I belive in defense of one's life. I believe you have the right to protect yourself. But you can protect yourself with sticks, stones, knives, etc. The Natural Rights were around waaayyyy before there were AR-15s. And will be there after them. So to hang anyones whole argument on them doesn't fly.
Can't believe I'm wading into the clusterf*ck of a thread, I should know better.
Some people, depending how and where they were raised will address someone as "sir" as a default salutation. You'll find it a lot with the more gentile Southeners and especially those with strict military backgrounds. It's the way I was raised and it takes considerable effort to break yourself of that.
So we're supposed to play rock, paper, scissors, at a gunfight? When the 2nd AMD is pretty clear? Got it.
when the laws are unconstitutional and pushed through using unconstitutional methods such as the buying of votes, gerrymandering for redistricting to put moonbats in office, etc. what happens then? that's what's happening now, dude.
on the surface it appears that all these processes are legitimate--but they clearly are not and full of holes and bullshit if you look. so what then? what now?
sticks and stones won't do much good when you've handed over your rifle and it is now in the personal collection of one of your own oppressors. think about it.
I belive in defense of one's life. I believe you have the right to protect yourself. But you can protect yourself with sticks, stones, knives, etc. The Natural Rights were around waaayyyy before there were AR-15s. And will be there after them.
So to me, if SOMEHOW something was passed and went through ALL of the processes legitimately, then I'd follow it UNLESS it was something obvious such as "murder all people wearing purple". That is why the guys who just sit home buy ammo and dig trenches aren't helping anyone. I swore to uphold the WHOLE Con. not jsut certain pieces.
NOW: We have the Natural Rights portion. I belive in defense of one's life. I believe you have the right to protect yourself. But you can protect yourself with sticks, stones, knives, etc. The Natural Rights were around waaayyyy before there were AR-15s. And will be there after them. So to hang anyones whole argument on them doesn't fly.
NOW: We have the Natural Rights portion. I belive in defense of one's life. I believe you have the right to protect yourself. But you can protect yourself with sticks, stones, knives, etc. The Natural Rights were around waaayyyy before there were AR-15s. And will be there after them. So to hang anyones whole argument on them doesn't fly.
When that happens, the country is already lost. We already have more liberals than conservatives within our borders. So even an all out revolution wont change much at that point as the liberals will simply vote more liberals back into office. I know this sucks to hear, but more and more conservatives are starting to think this way.
I was born in Louisiana and come from an extremely strict black southern family. I'm also a former Marine. I understand the concept of calling people "Sir" out of habit. I also understand how to use the term naturally so it does not interrupt the flow of the sentence. Primus' usage sounds extremely forced and carries a somewhat condescending overtone, whether that is his intention or not.
"a banana-suit-wearing apparent homosexual in love with peasant rifles who is a rampant advocate of freedom and liberty but has no sense of social decorum and says whatever, whenever. this person is to be avoided at all costs."
We have the right to defend ourselves using a force EQUAL to that of which is being used agaisnt us by our aggressors. That means anything that LEOs and Mil can own, we should be able to own. We are already handicaped by the NFA34 and FOPA86, and now the government wants an even more of an unbalanced playing field.
That begs the question, why?
have you checked out the violent crime in those places? gas chambers will come eventually in order to take care of the "bad" people and the trouble makersAnyone seen the UK lately? Ireland? Are there gas chambers there? THAT STATEMENT IS NOT ME ADVOCATING GUN BANS. That statement is trying to offset some of what was just said. Thats all.
Sir, if the Con. was ammended to take away the 2a, what would you do?
- - - Updated - - -
I get it sir, scrap all laws, give everyone guns and ammo, and let everyone me moral on their own..... Been to the Congo lately?
A revolution, or a threat of one might force a reorganizaiton. It's not just about "liberals and conservatives" either, per se. Happy fun ball would be if all the producers all migrated to the same parts/states of the country, and then everyone else would be more or less left with their ass in their hands... because they'd have nobody left to steal from.
-Mike
So not so much a revolution, but more like a civil war. Red states vs Blue states? Blue states go bankrupt while the Red states have all the guns.
I agree...I hate when people try and argue "the founding fathers couldn't predict we would have these evil super powerful assault weapons, they were talking about muskets!!!".....if you think about it back then THAT'S ALL THEY HAD...the MILITARY used muskets and they made sure in an AMENDMENT that the citizens had the SAME weapons as the military...which I'm sure they assumed would keep pace as weapons evolved.
Like I've said many times, I believe in the Con, ALL the time. Not just when it suits my needs. I'll try this again, please don't bash till it's over:
The Con. says that the state has a right to pas laws. The body that passes these laws must be made up of US, people. If the state passes a bogus law, then the poeple US fight it in court. We go to court, appeal (laid out in Con.) and it goes alllll the way up to SJC in MA. Of Supreme Court. There they decide if its Constitutional or "lawful". I didn't decide this process.
So to me, if SOMEHOW something was passed and went through ALL of the processes legitimately, then I'd follow it UNLESS it was something obvious such as "murder all people wearing purple". That is why the guys who just sit home buy ammo and dig trenches aren't helping anyone. I swore to uphold the WHOLE Con. not jsut certain pieces.
NOW: We have the Natural Rights portion. I belive in defense of one's life. I believe you have the right to protect yourself. But you can protect yourself with sticks, stones, knives, etc. The Natural Rights were around waaayyyy before there were AR-15s. And will be there after them. So to hang anyones whole argument on them doesn't fly.
It's great to hear guys views (even if they involve killing others).
60 pages and you guys are still feeding the troll!
PrimusTactical is a donkey and he's baiting everyone here perfectly... agreeing just enough to keep you involved, but disagreeing enough to keep you enraged.
Don't hate the thread dude! We're enjoying this.
passive-aggressive condescension much? no one said any such thing. don't for a second think we're all sitting here with murder-boners just waiting for "the balloon to go up".
which leftist rag is your piece for?
passive-aggressive condescension much? no one said any such thing. don't for a second think we're all sitting here with murder-boners just waiting for "the balloon to go up".
which leftist rag is your piece for?
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to atilla again.
I've seen plenty of SWAT teams with murder-boners just "delivering a few messages".