- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 3,352
- Likes
- 386
Another one in the making
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/2...sues-for-alleged-harassment-after-firing.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/2...sues-for-alleged-harassment-after-firing.html
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The pope has little sway over majority of Christianity so your assertion isn't exactly valid.Of course there is. Every denomination in the world has a left wing, a right wing, and moderates.
Ask the Pope. He'd laugh in your face if you told him all Catholics believed the same thing; he knows better.
The big problem with Islam? No pope. Nobody to arbitrate. So all the Sunnis get to be right.
The pope has little sway over majority of Christianity so your assertion isn't exactly valid.
The real issue is the basic tenants of the faith - the New Testament can be boiled down to Love Thy Neighbor. Nowhere is a Christian allowed to tax, enslave or kill because a person will not convert.
Islam is based on submission to Muhammad's Quran which allows for and encourages Muslims to tax, enslave and kill the kafir.
Sent from my C6530 using Tapatalk
Debating theology on NES will get us nowhere. My point is that most denominations of most religions have some sort of central authority that establishes doctrine; Islam doesn't.
Put it this way. Say you've got two demagogues preaching a destructive ideology that's out of their religion's mainstream. One is a Catholic priest, the other a Muslim imam. Catholicism has a mechanism by which the priest can get smacked down, Islam doesn't. So weirdo imams can flourish in Islam in a way that they can't in other religions.
That's my take, anyway.
Did you ever wonder why there is no need for a term "moderate" Catholic?
Id be curious to hear a little supposition based on historical theory in regards to these moderate muslims we all have in our lives. Personally I dont feel they are waiting for the right moment to rise up and strike us down as perhaps some would have you believe. But who actually thinks they are going to defend the non believers and fend off the radical elements of said religion if and when the time comes?
Hell forget history. Lets look at right now. How well do moderate muslims fare in most countries of origin? Can someone show me how well strength of conviction for peaceful islam fares over there? Without making anyone too ill on this fine sunday morning? Now thats a challenge...
My guess? The vast majority of Muslims are just like the vast majority of everyone else: their religion is a relatively minor part of their life, something incidental that they're born into and identify with, but which isnt very important to them day to day. There's a reason Christian church attendance surges at Easter and Christmas; mosques in most of the world (outside the Middle East, I'm thinking) are likely similar.
Even in the Middle East, my guess is that mosque attendance is likely driven more by habit and peer pressure than sheer religious devotion.
Guys with such a casual religious attitude certainly WILL NOT fend off the radicals within their own religion. Which, in my view, simply makes them human.
Naturally, my guesses fly in the face of the NES worldview, in which every single Muslim is a mindlessly devout ravager bent on global domination. So YMMV.
No religion in the Middle East is the most important thing in their lives. The mosque is where you go to settle disputes, learn to read and it is the center of their culture. It's an Islamic culture not a Arabic, Persian, or so on. This is why there are so many people named Mohammad and most flags have green in them-Islamic colors. Go to a Muslim majority country and try and open a church. Question the Koran. See what happens. This is an over 1000 year culture that keeps growing and expanding.
My guess? The vast majority of Muslims are just like the vast majority of everyone else: their religion is a relatively minor part of their life, something incidental that they're born into and identify with, but which isnt very important to them day to day. There's a reason Christian church attendance surges at Easter and Christmas; mosques in most of the world (outside the Middle East, I'm thinking) are likely similar.
We can agree to disagree.
But ask yourself: a "cafeteria Muslim" in Dearborn or Jakarta or Delhi follows the same faith as one from KSA, yet mosque attendance is much lower. If Muslims have other ways to settle disputes and learn to read, they'll use those just like everyone else. So, to me, that presents a good argument that culture trumps religion.
We can agree to disagree.
But ask yourself: a "cafeteria Muslim" in Dearborn or Jakarta or Delhi follows the same faith as one from KSA, yet mosque attendance is much lower. If Muslims have other ways to settle disputes and learn to read, they'll use those just like everyone else. So, to me, that presents a good argument that culture trumps religion.
You're more than welcome to disagree. But I know of nothing about Islam that would make it any more monolithic than Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Nazism, or anything else: there will always be a small, rabid minority and a vast majority that's just going along to get by, fit in, and avoid notice. People are people, no matter where they come from, and I think it's safer to assume they'll behave like people rather than automatons.
Guys with such a casual religious attitude certainly WILL NOT fend off the radicals within their own religion. Which, in my view, simply makes them human.
With that kind of radical egalitarianism you could be a teacher in the public school system. You'd fit right in.
That was the answer I was looking for. And because we are dealing with fellow humans you choose to take the same liberal path and refuse to actually look closer to what we are dealing with here. Id assume you feel our human pedophiles, rapists, and murderers should be dealt with in a similar compassionate manner?
Its tough have cake and eat it too. Unless of course your a hypocrite...
[video=youtube_share;38Ia9fWk07Y]http://youtu.be/38Ia9fWk07Y[/video]
Picton, what you seem to be missing is that the Koran calls for Jihad, or said another way, it calls for the most recent attack in London, Orlando nightclub, San Bernardino, Fort Hood, 911 and hundreds of other attacks.
Most Imams of the past interpreted the Koran for their followers and tweaked the message to something less violent than the printed word.
Today the Koran's message is available to everyone on the Internet. We're in an age of information and the information available demands Jihad.
The Koran is not the teachings of Jesus and being brought up a Christian I found it hard to grasp that a religion could exist that promoted the opposite of what Jesus taught.
Where did that come from? People generally avoid condemning each other; that's hardly groundbreaking science, and pointing it out doesn't make me a hypocrite. But we're discussing religious beliefs here, not criminal behaviors; a rapist deserves punishment no matter what religion he subscribes to. I'm not sure why you're linking them, though I'm sure somebody will try to make a comment about how all Muslims are rapists. Feel free...
It's an imperfect world, but its human nature. Unlike some of you, I don't expect humans to be anything but human. Perhaps it's your expectations that get so many of you so frustrated.
Now that I check again, the data I posted is even more forceful: of the 65% of Jordanians that go to mosque at all, only a little over a quarter do so more than once a week. And the Koran says a good Muslim has to go daily, no?
If all Muslims were violent, and if mosque attendance predicted terrorism, we'd be seeing more terrorists from Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, and Djibouti. And we're not.
All Muslims aren't violent, only those following the Koran.
Twisted how? I'll admit it: I've got no clue what point you're trying to make.