xtry51
NES Member
I agree. We need all citizens armed and government disarmed.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Supreme Court - NYSRPA v. Bruen - Megathread
- Thread starter soloman02
- Start date
I'm doing my best to comply!!
Tartakovsky
NES Member
5th circuit court of appeals strikes down federal domestic violence gun restraining order. He 5th circuit is the most conservative circuit by far so an appeal en banc won’t be a good option for the gov, they’ll need to appeal to SCOTUS who will likely deny cert (hearing the case). The 5th en banc just struck down the bump stock ban 13-3.
View: https://twitter.com/2aupdates/status/1621214956111777793?s=61&t=DvWn-6uZdqCseeIImeupvQ
Cheers frank lautenberg
Now do NFA
KBCraig
NES Member
That one has been filed by Matt Larosiere.
View: https://twitter.com/N1ghtTr4C3/status/1621127853667647488
Tartakovsky
NES Member
Its estimated that braced pistols are possessed by tens of millions of Americans. Sounds like “common use” as f***, according to Scalia‘s opinion in DC vs Heller.
Hitler in hair gel is big mad.
View: https://twitter.com/2Aupdates/status/1621288627069194245?cxt=HHwWisC47dLa_P8sAAAA
View: https://twitter.com/2Aupdates/status/1621288627069194245?cxt=HHwWisC47dLa_P8sAAAA
MaverickNH
NES Member
5th circuit court of appeals strikes down federal domestic violence gun restraining order. He 5th circuit is the most conservative circuit by far so an appeal en banc won’t be a good option for the gov, they’ll need to appeal to SCOTUS who will likely deny cert (hearing the case). The 5th en banc just struck down the bump stock ban 13-3.
View: https://twitter.com/2aupdates/status/1621214956111777793?s=61&t=DvWn-6uZdqCseeIImeupvQ
Cheers frank lautenberg
Additional from Volokh on the case. As in many civil rights cases, our rights are defined by those on the fringes of society - one might struggle to find the defendant virtuous but the choice to file a civil restraining order against him rather than prosecute him for his crimes is the government’s bad.
"Between December 2020 and January 2021, Rahimi was involved in five shootings in and around Arlington, Texas.1 On December 1, after selling narcotics to an individual, he fired multiple shots into that individual’s residence. The following day, Rahimi was involved in a car accident. He exited his vehicle, shot at the other driver, and fled the scene. He returned to the scene in a different vehicle and shot at the other driver’s car. On December 22, Rahimi shot at a constable’s vehicle. On January 7, Rahimi fired multiple shots in the air after his friend’s credit card was declined at a Whataburger restaurant."
Fifth Circuit Holds People Can't Be Disarmed Just Based on Civil Restraining Order
Judge James Ho concurs, adding "I write separately to point out that our Founders firmly believed in the fundamental role of government in protecting citizens against violence, as well as the individual right to keep and bear arms—and that these two principles are not inconsistent but entirely...
reason.com
CatSnoutSoup
NES Member
Hitler in hair gel is big mad.
View: https://twitter.com/2Aupdates/status/1621288627069194245?cxt=HHwWisC47dLa_P8sAAAA
I loathe Newsom who it is clear from that statement believes that our rights exist only at the grace of government.
Last edited:
KBCraig
NES Member
Sometimes, bad cases make bad law.
And other times, the worst possible cases make the best law.
If even that criminal a**h*** should retain his gun rights, why shouldn't everyone else?
Seeing some of the recent legal results, it seems like Bruen is slowly chipping away at the Appellate level and I've yet to see any Appeals court splits on anything yet, so the question would be once there is a split on something like magazine capacities, AWB, bump stocks, binary triggers, etc. would SCOTUS then grant cert to cases dealing with those things or would they just let the circuits continue to be split?
‘Retain A Lawyer’: Community Advocates Sound Alarm Over School Proposals To Have Parents Sign Off On Gun Storage
Community advocates are sounding the alarm over resolutions being considered by two Rhode Island school districts that would require parents to sign off on safe gun storage in their homes.
dailycaller.com
Reuters:
5th Circ. skeptical of ban on gun purchases by people facing felony charges
read:https:
//www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/5th-circ-skeptical-ban-gun-purchases-by-people-facing-felony-charges-2023-02-08/
5th Circ. skeptical of ban on gun purchases by people facing felony charges
read:https:
//www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/5th-circ-skeptical-ban-gun-purchases-by-people-facing-felony-charges-2023-02-08/
Last edited:
This is the panel hearing yesterday. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/OralArgRecordings/22/22-50834_2-8-2023.mp3
if this was really just about informing people of gun safety, they could just send a notice with no signature or response. And if they really cared, I hear the Eddie Eagle thing from the NRA is available for free.Funny cause RI can't help falling all over itself calling‘Retain A Lawyer’: Community Advocates Sound Alarm Over School Proposals To Have Parents Sign Off On Gun Storage
Community advocates are sounding the alarm over resolutions being considered by two Rhode Island school districts that would require parents to sign off on safe gun storage in their homes.abortioninfanticide "a right to privacy".
The Heller "common use" thing never really seems to stick. The new Bruen one seems to be working somehow though.
Courts were using a 2 step process of intermediate scrutiny, really rational basic. The courts would ask does this law impact the core of the second amendment, if so does the govt have a significant government interest do do this (public safety). Every court which upheld gun control laws used this process and because the court was 5-4 with Kennedy as the swing, SCOTUS didn’t want to risk taking cases. Kennedy was never a judge, he was a mediator who tried to appease each side in some way which is why so many decisions were mush.
Colorado is going full on pant shitting glue huffing Jonestown cult member
www.coloradopolitics.com
One can only hope that this over the top crap backfires on them in court.
Proposal allowing counties to bar gun discharge on private property advance, Dems kill GOP gun bills
Colorado's lawmakers have begun working on firearms legislation, including legislation to allow counties to bar discharging weapons on private properties, a proposal that has brought into sharp focus not just
KBCraig
NES Member
Sponsor said: "People move to rural communities for peace and quiet," she said, adding they aren't getting it.Colorado is going full on pant shitting glue huffing Jonestown cult member
One can only hope that this over the top crap backfires on them in court.Proposal allowing counties to bar gun discharge on private property advance, Dems kill GOP gun bills
Colorado's lawmakers have begun working on firearms legislation, including legislation to allow counties to bar discharging weapons on private properties, a proposal that has brought into sharp focus not just
OMG! Next thing you know, city people who move to rural communities will discover hogs, cattle, and the smell of shit!
They do .
And start demanding the farms that have been there a few hundred years before they got there be shut down.
ReggieB9mm
NES Member
And then we feed them to the hogs.
SFC13557
NES Member
Read more: CBS Report Details ‘Bruen’ Impact on Restrictive Gun Control Schemes
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- A lengthy CBS News report on the impact of last summer’s Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen indicates lingering angst among gun control proponents now faced with the daunting challenge of justifying restrictive gun laws when they may not be “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
In the first paragraph, CBS acknowledges, “the new legal test laid out by Justice Clarence Thomas in his majority opinion has reshaped the legal landscape for firearms laws and led to uncertainty over whether measures that aim to curb gun violence can survive legal scrutiny.”
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- A lengthy CBS News report on the impact of last summer’s Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen indicates lingering angst among gun control proponents now faced with the daunting challenge of justifying restrictive gun laws when they may not be “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
In the first paragraph, CBS acknowledges, “the new legal test laid out by Justice Clarence Thomas in his majority opinion has reshaped the legal landscape for firearms laws and led to uncertainty over whether measures that aim to curb gun violence can survive legal scrutiny.”
Garys
NES Member
Works for me , but then the meat is tainted.
crispnipz
NES Member
Nobody posted this one yet? This guy used Bruen to get this ruling. Now we'll get to see Biden's justice department argue against marijuana users. Get your potcorn, I mean popcorn, ready.
norml.org
Federal Court Rules Gun Ban for Marijuana Consumers Unconstitutional
The Justice Department is expected to appeal the ruling.
norml.org
United States v. Harrison, No. CR-22-00328-PRW | Casetext Search + Citator
Read United States v. Harrison, No. CR-22-00328-PRW, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
casetext.com
Nobody posted this one yet? This guy used Bruen to get this ruling. Now we'll get to see Biden's justice department argue against marijuana users. Get your potcorn, I mean popcorn, ready.
Federal Court Rules Gun Ban for Marijuana Consumers Unconstitutional
The Justice Department is expected to appeal the ruling.
United States v. Harrison, No. CR-22-00328-PRW | Casetext Search + Citator
Read United States v. Harrison, No. CR-22-00328-PRW, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal databasecasetext.com
It was posted last week, someone even started a thread on that decision alone
A federal judge in NY issued a TRO on NYs social media requirement they included in their gun control bill. I believe that’s 5 or 6 TROs against the bill so far
Federal judge in Illinois’ gun ban cases orders state to show 'each and every item banned'
(The Center Square) – Three federal lawsuits against Illinois’ gun ban made some movement Monday as a federal judge ordered a response from the state to show “each and every
View: https://twitter.com/2Aupdates/status/1625656035389198338?cxt=HHwWhMC-xaLjvo8tAAAA
Meanwhile also in NY
View: https://twitter.com/2Aupdates/status/1625619382842826761?cxt=HHwWkoCx5eeNro8tAAAA
KBCraig
NES Member
Here's a list of all the cases cited in the Bruen ruling.
reason.com
The Sources Cited by the Supreme Court in Bruen
Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.
reason.com
KBCraig
NES Member
I see, Sir, that you have studied your John Ross.
