+1 on the vortex. THe PST line is fine.
Before I'd put 1200 down on a Leupold, I'd go Zeiss or Swarovski in a heartbeat.
If I was putting $1200 on a leupold, I'd double it and get a midlevel Swarovski for sure.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
+1 on the vortex. THe PST line is fine.
Before I'd put 1200 down on a Leupold, I'd go Zeiss or Swarovski in a heartbeat.
It is something I'd like to learn, and learn to be good with, which is why I am looking for it. However, I'm open to anything that will help with rangefinding and accuracy at unknown ranges, so anything that is graduated on the reticle.Don't get all hung up on the mil-dot reticle, it's just my opinion but unless you are actully going to learn how to use it your limiting your choices. The Leupold Mk2 I mentioned has a duplex reticle and it's the scope I like the most, you just have to learn how to holdover.
I'm not really, I wouldn't mind if I went to the mailbox and had a Swarovski waiting for me.NVM, saw you are talking big money optics.
For mounts, is there anything I need to keep in mind for a scope I'm going to use for shooting out to 600 at the range? Do you need taller rings or anything?
Hard to beat a Sightron for the money. Weaver T series is pretty nicevfor short money.
B
I'm not really, I wouldn't mind if I went to the mailbox and had a Swarovski waiting for me.
The more economical glass folks are talking about here, especially in the $350-$500 range is awesome.
Scartch highpower off the list of uses. Scopes are not allowed in NRA Highpower or CMP rifle matches.
As for inexpensive but not cheap glass, look at Weaver Tacticals.
Thought F-class was under the highpower umbrella.