I’m surprised there weren’t more MA chiefs signing on to that letter.
Did I miss the dripping sarchasm? Nearly every MA city and town of any consequence, their chief is named on this letter....
-Mike
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I’m surprised there weren’t more MA chiefs signing on to that letter.
I also find it amusing that there are chiefs on that list that are in f***ing con carry states (like Maine).... are they just clueless or something?
I guess we can add this to "what has Comm2A done for us?"."we don't want Comm2A (or another independent attorney) up our ass sideways" ... so some towns are not really pro gun, but more like "path of least resistance". These towns/chiefs would still gladly stab you in the back given slightest provocation.
I guess we can add this to "what has Comm2A done for us?".
I know for a fact that some green towns have been painted thusly by Comm2A. The paint is water soluble and will wash off if we don't have a crew of painters at the ready.
I also find it amusing that there are chiefs on that list that are in f***ing con carry states (like Maine).... are they just clueless or something?
ETA:
Anyone else notice the crapflooding in the document? Lots of people like this
guy mentioned.... and also lots of DUPLICATE names under different
roles, etc. Did they have an anti write this document?
"Data Technician Ii John Lara, Texas Dps Crime Records Service, Austin, TX"
like what the f*** is next, are they going to add the janitor of the PD on the list, too?
-Mike
Vote early, vote often!A quick scan on just MA alone shows 3 cities listed twice, Brookline, Salisbury, and Lynnfield, the latter 2 with the same chief listed twice, as well.
Oh good, so all we need is for 40-something different sets of ego maniacs to come together and agree on something.None of this matters now because natrep is never passing. IMHO otherwise badgeless gun carriers would do well to ponder the idea of a non-federal arrangement. This doesn't fix the garbage state problem, but if the shall issue states can agree on a reciprocity compact and offer an enhanced permit (this allows them to NOT change their laws, yet still offer a permit thats conformal to the states that have worse laws than they do, thus not destroying freedom in the process) and we get like all the loose stragglers united under one enhanced license, then this basically creates a national embarassment for the half dozen or so shithole states.... and that gets to be held over their head in the media and other circles.... and the brilliant part is it wouldn't need the federal government involved AT ALL in order for it to happen, just the cooperation of non shithole states to agree to honor an enhanced permit standard.
-Mike
So, should we be downgrading any green town whose chief signed on?
Vote early, vote often!
Wouldn't help us at all.
As Len indicates also, the antis absolutely HATE LEOSA. The fact that it gives them major hemorrhoids is good enough for it to stay in my book.
Most of the people running under LEOSA are also pro gun, too, not the "I don't need my gun when I'm off duty, so no one else should either" brand of douchebag.
-Mike
Oh good, so all we need is for 40-something different sets of ego maniacs to come together and agree on something.
Is there a town in Mass that didn't sign on? NH had what, 5? ME also had a very small number.
Both Hopkinton and Ashland did not, among others.
That is exactly how driver licenses work. There is no federally mandated DL reciprocity, it's all an agreement between the states to recognize the others' licenses..... and the brilliant part is it wouldn't need the federal government involved AT ALL in order for it to happen, just the cooperation of non shithole states to agree to honor an enhanced permit standard.
I opposed LEOSA when I was an active LEO, because the Constitution doesn't allow for such federal mandates.Yeah, let's get rid of LEOSA. No reciprocity for us peons, then the same for state and local LEO's.
Is there a town in Mass that didn't sign on? NH had what, 5? ME also had a very small number.
None of this matters now because natrep is never passing. IMHO otherwise badgeless gun carriers would do well to ponder the idea of a non-federal arrangement. This doesn't fix the garbage state problem, but if the shall issue states can agree on a reciprocity compact and offer an enhanced permit (this allows them to NOT change their laws, yet still offer a permit thats conformal to the states that have worse laws than they do, thus not destroying freedom in the process) and we get like all the loose stragglers united under one enhanced license, then this basically creates a national embarassment for the half dozen or so shithole states.... and that gets to be held over their head in the media and other circles.... and the brilliant part is it wouldn't need the federal government involved AT ALL in order for it to happen, just the cooperation of non shithole states to agree to honor an enhanced permit standard.
-Mike
In the United States of America, an interstate compact is an agreement between two or more states. Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution provides that "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State." Consent can be obtained in one of three ways. First, there can be a model compact and Congress can grant automatic approval for any state wishing to join it, such as the Driver License Compact. Second, states can submit a compact to Congress prior to entering into the compact. Third, states can agree to a compact then submit it to Congress for approval, which, if it does so, causes it to come into effect. Not all compacts between states require explicit Congressional approval – the Supreme Court ruled in Virginia v. Tennessee that only those agreements which would increase the power of states at the expense of the federal government required it.
Chief Michael R. Bennett is asking for tax money after going out of his way to be the only COP in north central MA signing on to a letter telling lawful gun owners they are not to be trusted. To be sure as part of the LEO privileged class of citizens Mike takes advantage of Federal LEOSA regs when he travels. Stop putting yourself above us -- get your tin cup and stand on the corner for the dough Mike!
The Boston Police Facebook page posted this letter and the comments are 99% against Commissioner Evans opinion.
View: https://www.facebook.com/BostonPoliceDepartment/posts/10155539053857685
That gave me a chuckle.
So Bill Evans goes out of his way to sign on to a letter telling lawful gun owners they are not to be trusted. To be sure, as part of the LEO privileged class of citizens, Bill takes advantage of Federal LEOSA reciprocity when he travels privately. Stop putting yourself above us Bill and grabbing for power that is not granted you as a municipal employee -- was this political lobbying done on taxpayer's time?
BTW - Why is the "official" BPD Facebook page being used for Bill Evans' private fraternal activities and political lobbying?
My bad, should have included a sarcasm tag.The ONLY people that even know of that rating (or care) are on this website. And most of us are pretty much stuck where we are.
The Boston Police Facebook page posted this letter and the comments are 99% against Commissioner Evans opinion.
View: https://www.facebook.com/BostonPoliceDepartment/posts/10155539053857685
That gave me a chuckle.
That is exactly how driver licenses work. There is no federally mandated DL reciprocity, it's all an agreement between the states to recognize the others' licenses.
A couple of states allow drivers licenses before the age of 16 (I think both Dakotas still do this).We still have the patchwork. Different states have different rules, procedures, tests... But a Montana drivers license is still good anywhere a Massachusetts license is.