OK, I'll take up this pissing match.
Let's first start with "thanks for the welcome". So you know, calling me anti is like calling or current president a coherent one. so take your fuddboi (whatever that is) to the cleaners.
Second, my comment was sarcasm faced at the vitriol here, aimed at someone not present. I didn't realize when joined up here that the discourse was insult first, second and third, and then avoid a cogent argument only to make accusations with every poster not aligned with your "fudd everybody" attitude.
3rd, you and too many misinterpret the 2a. yes we have the right to bare arms, as we should; I also agree those "rights" should not be infringed (and we shouldn't be so limited by the state/feds in our ownership); what's missing ... it is the state's (whichever you're in) REQUIREMENT to uphold those rights and if needed at the cost and effort of a militia to do so.
But this is where you have failed: you couch jocky your sanctimonious position on gun rights, berate anyone not championing your forum post and bully those in disagreement. your failure is the inability to debate, conversate, argue your position. do better. if not for you, for all rights of all citizens.
and finally, where does this shop owners opinion, (right/wrong/indifferent) infringe on your right to arms?
(nevermind, don't answer, I've already made up my mind on what you would write) - see how that goes?
(shight, don't answer that one either, I can only imagine the insults i'll get)