You should have the right to fire him. He is your employee after all.
Sorry but that is laughable.
You have no idea how the "system operates"!
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
You should have the right to fire him. He is your employee after all.
Sorry but that is laughable.
You have no idea how the "system operates"!
In the case of the Fish Stick FID, this statement was indeed accurate as the issuing authority had formally refused to issue. In other cases, such as the one I just mentioned, compliance with the extra-legal requirement represents the quickest, least expensive, way to get the desired license."The ONLY venue for such individuals is court,"
Yet you still insist that "The ONLY venue for such individuals is court," while denigrating those whose preferences for a quick license or financial inability or unwillingness to go the long, expensive route leads them to grudgingly take a different tactical approach and comply with the extra-legal requirements imposed by the department. You then acknowledge the differences between tactics and strategy, and claim that you "don't denigrate those who work by other means," while characterizing those those who adopt those other, strategic means (and have the effrontery to point out your single-tool tactics neither work for everyone nor necessarily deal with the strategic issues) of believing only in a "path to enlightenment" or a "plan for a Great Leap Forward" undisclosed or perhaps unknowable to
There you go again, confusing the issue with relevant facts.hus, as I stated, that is "the only venue" for any applicant denied a license.
True, but not everyone is inclined to spend several thousand dollars and a whole bunch of time to make a point.Anyone who complies with unlawful demands is NOT working to prevent the abuses OR change the manner in which those abuses are permitted. Rather, such obeisance aids and abets the bullies, perpetuates existing abuses and encourages new ones.
First impression: You friend (or friends; you're mixing up tenses in your statement) should move out of Pembroke. Or hire a good lawyer.Ayone want to give me their take on this? Friend is looking into getting their LTC.
Some of us, however, are stubborn and would pay that money to simply have the win and rub the fascists' nose in it.True, but not everyone is inclined to spend several thousand dollars and a whole bunch of time to make a point.
Some of us, however, are stubborn and would pay that money to simply have the win and rub the fascists' nose in it.
As far as sophistry, you continue to evade, avoid and otherwise attempt to distract from your inability to document ANY policy of yours with documented results. Readers may infer accordingly.
Boys and girls, can we just agree that BOTH approaches are necessary? Ken's for legislation that hasn't yet been passed and Keith's for the onerous regulations that we currently suffer under.
I found great satisfaction in winning my case.
The judge ordered the chief to issue. I called the chief and asked him where was my license. He said, "Oh, just come up here and fill out a current application, and you'll be all set."
Something didn't sound right. I called my lawyer. She told me NOT to do what the chief said. Karen said if I did go and fill out another application, the Chief could then deny me as an unsatisfactory candidate. Since he refused for cause with the first application, I could win in court and get the judge to order the issuance of the license. But if I had submitted another form, he could, and would, deny me and have every right to do it.
Only lawyers know these little details. If it wasn't for that piece of advice, I'd probably have filled out another application, and today I wouldn't have a permit.
Some CLEOs play dirty. You need any tool you can get to beat the bad ones.
Karen about cut his balls off when he told me that. She called him and told him what the meaning of the judge's order was, she sent him registered mail with the decision and her cover letter saying why I would NOT fill out another application, and she contacted the court to start contempt charges against the chief. I got the license within 3 days.
It was a beautiful thing to watch and learn from. It was SOOOOO cool!
I’m totaly with you !! I spent over ten grand for my right to Cary ! Further more I’m collateral damage from Darius arbarbi and jessy cohen ! Represented myself at the flrb hearing and got a favorable decision ! That’s how much it means to me !!Thanks for the answer Scrivener.
After 15 years of having my LTC, the 1998 gun laws made my CLEO question my right to be licensed, due to a misdemeanor conviction that would have made me a non eligible person according to his interpretation of the new laws.
It cost me plenty overall for Karen to win my case, but I'd say it was worth every penny of it. It took almost 8 months, and ran my business into the ground (Gun photography for several major manufacturers magazine ads and catalogs. I'd rather not name the companies involved, but my work was full page covers on Guns and Ammo, Handguns, The American Rifleman, Shooting times, Dillon Blue Press and many more for many years). I couldn't handle handguns due to his delayed issuing of my license, which he was eventually ordered to do in court. Before that decision, my business had gone away as I couldn't solicit work or bring handguns into my studio. I was told that I could not even touch a pistol to get the correct angle on my photos, even if I had another licensed assistant to help me. I couldn't even store handguns in the safe at my studio, as I was not holding a current license.
I'm with you, I couldn't tolerate the CLEOs decision, so I fought back, and paid the price. Now if I even got a hint that there would be a problem with a renewal, I'd be on the phone to you so fast you'd think I had a direct line.
The CLEOs know they can get away with this stuff, and the town pays their court costs, so they don't care how many people threaten to take them to court. More people have to actually TAKE THEM TO COURT, to correct their actions.
Next to my Wife, Family, Country and my God, there is nothing more important to me than my right to own and carry firearms. I will not sit back and let someone push me around without a fight.
The sad part is that this "question" he asked about my right to be licensed came about very shortly after I spoke at town meeting against increasing the CLEO's educational expenses for the following budget year by $5500.
Looks like you lost the right again, due to the BATFE interpretation of Logan v. US.Represented myself at the flrb hearing and got a favorable decision ! That’s how much it means to me !!
I’m totaly with you !! I spent over ten grand for my right to Cary ! Further more I’m collateral damage from Darius arbarbi and jessy cohen ! Represented myself at the flrb hearing and got a favorable decision ! That’s how much it means to me !!
Looks like you lost the right again, due to the BATFE interpretation of Logan v. US.
Yes sirLooks like you lost the right again, due to the BATFE interpretation of Logan v. US.