So, just another case of the government stealing someone's property leaving the burden of proof on the property owner?
Sounds eerily similar to forcing a farmer to destroy his livestock because some government employee thought the animals tail should be straight & not curly.
Well, hey, as long as a child's life is saved by it I guess it's all good. [/sarc]
It's the progressive way.
- - - Updated - - -
Alright, enough of this shit. Grow up. Lets get back on topic. This thread is about a gun debate, we've all drifted. And, you are starting to become obnoxious.