VTski4x4
NES Member
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Oh...“The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations,” the NRA said in a written statement.
If you are an organization that constantly points to the NFA as evidence that ARs are not full auto, you kind of have to say this to maintain credibility. Its the reality of the situation.
Mike
if obama was president they would be fighting this. cowards.
If you are an organization that constantly points to the NFA as evidence that ARs are not full auto, you kind of have to say this to maintain credibility. Its the reality of the situation.
Mike
I think there’s a philosophical argument to be made along those lines, but I think the NRA is a political, not philosophical organization and I think they’re on the wrong side of politics here. Maybe they’re hoping it will defuse some of the Lib NRA hate, but politically they’re dead wrong.
Why?
It requires the shooter to maintain preessure in two directions with two hands
A firearm equipt with a BF stock still only shoots one round with each depression of the trigger
Which clearly skirts the intent of the NFA. The ATF agrees with your reasoning, as do I, but its also easy to say the legislative intent wouldn't have allowed for bump stocks, the NRA is fine with (and always points to the NFA when comparing to ARs) clearing that up to roll these under NFA.
Mike
CA/MA compliant ARs skirt the intent of the AWBs - I assume you’re against those as well.
Which clearly skirts the intent of the NFA. The ATF agrees with your reasoning, as do I, but its also easy to say the legislative intent wouldn't have allowed for bump stocks, the NRA is fine with (and always points to the NFA when comparing to ARs) clearing that up to roll these under NFA.
Mike
Also, you guys ditching support for the NRA are making a huge mistake. Maybe they made the wrong political decision here, maybe they didn't, but they need our support. Cutting off your nose to spite your face is not something helpful here.
I have a lot of gripes with the NRA, but there power, which is almost entirely in their membership, has done a TON for us in recent years.
Mike
I may be in the minority on this thread but I see this as a strategic move by the NRA.
Paraphrase to a poem about Nazi Germany.
First they came for the bump stocks and I did not care as I did not use one or own one, or was just a hunter fudd. ect, ect, ect And they came for all the guns with a sentence of death if you did not turn them in.
not ditching my support, I'm a life member and still will donate- just expressing my frustrations.
I may be in the minority on this thread but I see this as a strategic move by the NRA.
H
Basically this. Taking a stand on Bump Stocks was a lose/lose battle. As I said in another post Bump Fire Stocks are done, kaput. Fight to save them will do nothing but hurt the NRA and any pro-gun organization that tries to defend them. Even GOAL is distancing themselves from it. This is a major chess match and you have to let a rook die (rook = bump stock) to save the queen.
To not support the NRA or GOAL or any pro-gun group over this is very short sighted and only will hurt us more in the long run.