So now we have Cohen, of PGNH bashing Susan Olsen (who like I said earlier is a very good activist).
http://pgnh.org/oh_my_god_a_state_g...of_our_gun_rights_note_two_exclamation_points
Since the time I started writing this and got a break from work to finish this, the article has been pulled down.
The low down is that Sam Cohen wrote this attack piece without consulting the rest of PGNH.
It seems like, because Cohen and Sweeney are friends, that Cohen believed Sweeney when he said nothing is wrong. Note, in the attack piece, Cohen never once mentions the other two questions nor addresses how this change was made illegally.
Something smells fishy at the DoS. I never heard back from Sweeney on the other issues that PD's are pulling with regard to licensing (extra forms, photocopies of ID, etc) and as far as I know that is still occurring (in fact I just found out about another town requiring a photocopy of your ID).
At this point I am of the opinion that Sweeney (a PGNH Senior Advisor) has turned and is no longer an ally.
Just Sweeney? I want nothing to do with PGNH after their support of SB244 - if you have not seen the PGNH testimony on SB244, please find the video and do so.
As I said before, at that session PGNH acted as Nappen's business development group - they supported SB244, which would have created more work for firearm lawyers while hurting innocent people in the process.
See post 18 in the thread below for my immediate reaction to that testimony:
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/235685-NH-call-these-senators-before-Tues-Jan-14
And post 28 in the thread above for Nappen's testimony.
More background:
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vb...alth-Study-Committee-Senate-Votes-on-March-27
http://www.northeastshooters.com/vb...s-Anyone-Know-Who-This-Article-is-Refering-To
Last edited: