But there is already a system that achieve your goal of 90% < 1 hour, and it saves all the extra cost that additional staffing would need. So why not use that system?
And remember, NH is a partial point of presence, the "gun line" still runs the Fed check, they just also run their own local checks. Anything that would deny/delay on the Fed check still flows down to the "gun line". And sure they can resolve any of the local checks that cause a deny, but if its Fed that still needs to be cleared there. So when you hear those stories about a "gun line" denial being resolved with a phone call, that's only because it was the "gun line" that screwed up in the first place, it would not have been a denial in the Fed system. They even have a name for that statistic (info I got from the DOS and posted in another thread), it's called an "Amended Denial"
Transfer wait times?
I know some are concerned that changes in the Fed law could make thing worse for all of us, that is a separate issue. Any additional Fed restriction will be applied to us with or without the "gun line". FFLs have to follow the Fed laws. If the "gun line" became a way around the Fed law they would just revoke NH's point of presence status. That status is based on an agreement, the law allows it but all it takes is a letter to revoke it.