another vote for sw m+p. Love the hand feel.
+1 the weight on the m&p is a lot better than the weight on the sigma...sigma feels too much like a toy
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
another vote for sw m+p. Love the hand feel.
I think it's sort of interesting that no one had anything to say about the Ruger and it fell completely out of the conversation.
What part of inexpensive and new shooter did you miss? Or are you advocating a subcompact 10mm as a good range gun for someone new?I picked up my first gun, a Glock 29, for $450. That's only $50 more than your price range...
Worked fine for me, I don't see what got your panties all in a bunch.What part of inexpensive and new shooter did you miss? Or are you advocating a subcompact 10mm as a good range gun for someone new?
I think it's sort of interesting that no one had anything to say about the Ruger and it fell completely out of the conversation.
Worked fine for me, I don't see what got your panties all in a bunch.
This. Or save and get an M&P. You might not even need to save, used M&Ps run about $400.
And the last time I bought 10mm ammo I picked up some M&M Reloads for $13.75/50rds, whats your point? I mean for everything thing you've said up until this point?Well the last time I bought 10mm ammo it was almost as expensive as .45 That may well work for you but I still don't see how a subcompact Glock in 10mm is the thing for a non carry piece as a first pistol.
Agreed, keep your eye open in the classifieds. I picked up a very lightly used M&P9 full size last summer for $375, and a M&P9c unfired for $400. Add a trigger job and you've got a much better gun that a Sigma for not that much more.