Bro? Is that a video gamers term? Laughing out loud.Thanks bro...
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Bro? Is that a video gamers term? Laughing out loud.Thanks bro...
sorry, but you are screwed if the DUI was after after 1993 ( the exact date is sometime in 1994), short of getting a Governor's pardon ( ain't happening and sometimes that will not restore gun rights) you are not going to get a permit.
To answer your original question, with an FID, you should be able to possess a fixed magazine rifle that looks like an AR. However, you face two possible problems:
1) A know-it-all dealer who says he can't sell it to you because you don't have a Class A LTC. He'd be wrong, but that doesn't mean he'll sell it to you.
2) A know-it-all cop who says you can't possess an AR (super-duper killy, black, military style assault rifle) who takes you to jail for carrying a prohibited item. Then you get to hire me (or another lawyer) and pay me a shit-ton of money to have an expert (for whom you get to pay another shit-ton of money for) to explain to the judge that the item seized is not prohibited. Even so, if you get the wrong (gun hating) judge, he'll still find you guilty, thus making you a prohibited person.
Please note that I don't see #2 as a likely occurrence, but my job is to hope for the best, but plan for the worst.
Since you already have an FID, go ahead and apply for a LTC. If the chief denies you, you're only out $100. You'll still have your FID. If the chief later denies the renewal of your FID, you'll have a great argument that the decision was arbitrary and capricious.
Since you already have an FID, go ahead and apply for a LTC. If the chief denies you, you're only out $100. You'll still have your FID.
I'd be curious to hear what swatgig has to say, but I would think that since the definition of unsuitable is the same for an LTC and an FID, wouldn't it be difficult for the CoP to defend a suitability denial for an LTC when the person already has an FID?
I'd buy an un-neutered AR privately, here or in another state and risk arrest before I'd ever plunk hard-earned cash down on one of those fixed-magazine abominations...
...but, that is me.
Besides, as a post-1994 AR owner you would already be a Criminal-In-Waiting...
Welcome to NES!
~Matt
... and you have to answer "yes" to "have you ever been denied... " for the rest of your life.
FIDs aren't subject to suitability anymore. They can only be denied for statutory reasons.
LTCs can be denied for suitability, but the CoP has to put them in writing in an articulateable form. (no, "he didn't seem safe" nonsense)
Of course this is only a MA problem.I'd buy an un-neutered AR privately, here or in another state and risk arrest before I'd ever plunk hard-earned cash down on one of those fixed-magazine abominations...
...but, that is me.
Besides, as a post-1994 AR owner you would already be a Criminal-In-Waiting...
Welcome to NES!
~Matt
The fixed magazine ar's do not a felon in waiting make.
Easy to say, but a good option. Jack.You could just move.
The fixed magazine ar's do not a felon in waiting make.
Still, I don't especially like them.
if they don't already have them someone should develop a speed loader or a kind of stripper clip for them. Won't be as fast as a mag change but it would be so much faster than one at a time...
buy them now before they ban those too.There are two common ones on the market, the Bear Flag BF10 and the Mean Arms MALoader. Some smart guy did a nice review on them.
Good idea. Mean Arms Loader already solves the problem and loads 10 rds faster than you can change the magazine.if they don't already have them someone should develop a speed loader or a kind of stripper clip for them. Won't be as fast as a mag change but it would be so much faster than one at a time...
Good idea. Mean Arms Loader already solves the problem and loads 10 rds faster than you can change the magazine.
Did it. If you want it you can do it. If NH ever goes the way of Ma**h***vania I'll do it again.Easy to say, but a good option. Jack.
No, that would go like, "do you even lift brah?"Bro? Is that a video gamers term? Laughing out loud.
To answer your rifle question, yes I have one and like it. It’s a quality rifle and worth the buy in my opinion. Bought it from Eddie Coyle here on NES. Good rifle and good guy.I have a valid fid please read my posts, that is not the issue just bought ammo yesterday. just curious if I had a shot at my ltc and if anyone had any experience with the two rifles I mentioned in my OP.
Wasr 10s are fid compliant? You mean the Detachable mag ak style variant? How do you own one of theses as you mention in the op? The sks I could see but not a wasr. Am I not connecting some dots here? Maura?
... and you have to answer "yes" to "have you ever been denied... " for the rest of your life.
FIDs aren't subject to suitability anymore. They can only be denied for statutory reasons.
LTCs can be denied for suitability, but the CoP has to put them in writing in an articulateable form. (no, "he didn't seem safe" nonsense)
Should be difficult, but in reality it's not. Court upheld the denial.I'd be curious to hear what swatgig has to say, but I would think that since the definition of unsuitable is the same for an LTC and an FID, wouldn't it be difficult for the CoP to defend a suitability denial for an LTC when the person already has an FID?
I think you have the FID part backwards, it used to be no suitability with FID but was added in the 2014 gun reform BS
Sometimes I don't like what you sayShould be difficult, but in reality it's not. Court upheld the denial.