Hardly.
1. IF "the legislature was pretty miffed," it has done NOTHING to act on that alleged anger - unless you call C. 180 an AG beat-down, which I don't.
2. You don't even have the right AG. Coakley came in AFTER the regs in question.
1. You are correct. I was implying and hoping that they may be newly emboldened.
2. I know that. Please indicate where I said it was Coakley.
(If you meant:
Maybe with her senatorial defeat, they will be more bold.
then, that was just a continuity of the position, and the process would carry through to her, and the action would take place with the present occupant of that position.)
Last edited: