Gun restrictionist dog whistle alarm triggered on "common sense."
Gun restrictionist dog whistle alarm triggered by "reasonable."
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Gun restrictionist dog whistle alarm triggered on "common sense."
Gun restrictionist dog whistle alarm triggered by "reasonable."
NATICK – Town officials are mulling a potential fall Town Meeting article that would ban guns on town property such as parks and buildings.
The proposal stems from an incident where a person involved in what was described as a heated discussion at a public meeting appeared to have a gun. While officials are not sure the person actually had a gun, it brought to mind the ban, which Town Administrator Martha White and Police Chief James Hicks deem to be a "common sense proposal," according to a memo from White to selectmen.
**** natick. Bastards run the parking meters on weekends, which I figured out after being awarded a ticket for a 20 minute stop at B&K.
No one was shot, no one knows if the guy who didn't shoot anyone even had a gun, so the proper course of action is to pass a law banning guns from public property? Makes perfect sense. Let's extend that reasoning a little.
It was a guy, so he probably has a penis and testicles. No one saw them, and he didn't sexually assault anyone, but to prevent any future sexual assaults, perhaps Natick should ban anyone with male genitalia from public property.
Make all of Natick a "penis free" zone and put up appropriate signage.
How about Natick specifically bans police details within city limits since the detail officers rarely ever do anything besides sit in their vehicle and read the newspaper. It's a common sense cost savings that should be implemented immediately.
**** natick. Bastards run the parking meters on weekends, which I figured out after being awarded a ticket for a 20 minute stop at B&K.
http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/article/20140814/NEWS/140818364/1994/NEWS
Heads up for people in Natick.
There is to a degree - I don't think the town can impose any criminal penalties without an approved "home rule petition".So I can only assume that MASS has no state preemption? You could not pass this load of sh!t in Rhode Island BECAUSE the state has preemption. The only laws a town can pass is actual discharge distances in relation to houses.
IIRC, Natick has an ordinance that prohibits sale of lighters and matches to minors.
It was proposed by a minor that had a psychological condition that made him start fires.
At least, they're consistent.
Imagine being arrested, charged, brought before a jury and lose and jailed because someone you've never seen, or met, had a panic attack and called the police because he/she thought you had a gun, and all the legal system required for conviction was proof the person had a panic attack, said the word "gun" and pointed at you.so a person may have had a gun.......didnt use it to threaten anyone but may have had one so now we must ban all guns from town premises?
How's their drug ban on school property working out?
Holy crap! I bene one lucky SOB then. I never knew that. What kind of town runs meters on weekends?