MaroonedinMA
NES Member
I dream of a two-stamp SBR...
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Then MA will force you to have one for every gun. Plan could backfire pretty easily in this POS state.The trick is to slip this into an occupational safety bill as a hearing protection device, which it is, or a conservation bill for reducing nuisance noise created by hunters, which they do in addition to hearing protection/better situational awareness for safety.
I'm shocked they aren't mandatory in MA if it weren't for the ban. Ditto for lead free ammo and not requiring a MA proofing stamp on the barrels by a MA certified gunsmith just like auto inspections. Cuz the UK requires such things and MA is trying so hard to get back under the thumb of one crown or another.Then MA will force you to have one for every gun. Plan could backfire pretty easily in this POS state.
So, do you think they should require every gun have a silencer? ... that would get expensive fast.The law is retarded. Cars and motorcycles require mufflers because without them, the explosions from combustion engines are far too loud. But even with them on, you can clearly still hear them from distance. It would be no different with suppressors save for maybe subsonic bolt action. Secondly, where is the concern coming from? How many instances have there been with crime/shootings happening with suppressors in other states that allow them? Third, the typical gang style shootings that are most common are not going to involve suppressors out of the sheer cost, paperwork hassle, and the fact that most of those shooters are illegally acquiring guns in the first place. There is no reason to disallow them in MA. If anything, they could even improve neighbor relations at gun ranges. But I suppose I'm preaching to the choir here.
The only reason they aren't is because the left spent so much time scaring the sheep, they can't make them mandatory.I'm shocked they aren't mandatory in MA if it weren't for the ban. Ditto for lead free ammo and not requiring a MA proofing stamp on the barrels by a MA certified gunsmith just like auto inspections. Cuz the UK requires such things and MA is trying so hard to get back under the thumb of one crown or another.
I dream of a two-stamp SBR...
So, do you think they should require every gun have a silencer? ... that would get expensive fast.
Without requiring it, the range/ neighbor relationship wouldn't really improve since most people wouldn't buy one.
If poiliticnas really wanted to f*ck with gun owners, that is exactly what they would do.
That $500 handgun now will cost an additional $500 silencer + tax + however long it takes to get the paperwork done. And good luck carrying concealed.
So stop dreaming. Rent a closet at your buddy's gas station for $50/mo, put into it a 5 gal. bucket to keep your paperwork in, get the 07FFL and pay the SOT. Buy your NFA stuff on Form3s or DIY and register them on Form2s. No stamps and the sky is the limit. Take EddieCoyle's class on "how to" for details if you want. Jack.I dream of a two-stamp SBR...
Now you're just being greedy. But...3 is bigger than 2, so.Why not three? Underslung Destructive Devices are cool as hell.
THIS!!!The only thing that's going to be silenced here in Massachusetts is our right to free speech.
Now you're just being greedy. But...3 is bigger than 2, so.
That's good thinkin, Tex.That's why I always buy European pocket pistols - more stopping power.
7.65 is WAY bigger than 0.32 and I get to use the same ammo for both
What about Beanie Babies ????I can only assume these people owned a pet rock, and still have Beanie Babies.
Hahaha watch them do what Connecticuck did - sure, suppressors are legal but a pistol with a threaded barrel? Illegal unless it's PrEbAN