Ben Cartwright SASS
NES Member
I was reading in America's First Freedom about Jackson v. San Francisco suit. This is where he is suing based on the fact that SF requires a gun to be locked at all times in the home unless being carried on your person, i.e. under your direct control. They are suing based on the ordinance contradicting the Heller decision.
Isn't that what we have here? If I am cleaning my gun at the kitchen table and answer the door leaving the disassembled gun on the table I can get arrested for having an unsecured gun, not under my direct control if it is a cop at the door (I have heard it HAS happened)
Do you (Knuckle dragger) ever see that happening here?
Isn't that what we have here? If I am cleaning my gun at the kitchen table and answer the door leaving the disassembled gun on the table I can get arrested for having an unsecured gun, not under my direct control if it is a cop at the door (I have heard it HAS happened)
Do you (Knuckle dragger) ever see that happening here?