If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
It's like that old advertisement for the Audi 5000, 5 cylinder automobile.It’s less than 15 and more than 10 but closer to 10 than 15, so my guess is politicians on both sides bent over but we know who bent over the most. Or, it was Common Cote Math that solve the problem, which wasn’t really a problem to begin with. Sort of like what Common Core did for math.
I hate to be the one to say it, but unless we take back the schools and universities, we're done. The dope-smoking, have sex in the mud at Woodstock baby boomers have taken over EVERYTHING, and have pushed forward all of this Marxist BS. The succeeding generations are even worse.based on what I see from the majority of Americans, Im proud to be in the minority
While this is a win, it is very limited in scope .. in that the TRO only applies to the ~860 named participants in the suit.
"Pritzker’s cousin James Nicholas Pritzker, who in 2013 announced he is a transsexual now known as Jennifer N. Pritzker, is behind the push to move the collection north."The Pritzker family is opening a gun range in Kenosha Wisconsin. This would be akin to Maura opening a range in Nashua
Pritzker family opens Wisconsin gun range as over 170 types of guns are outlawed: 'The growth is a testament to public interest in preserving the stories of our country’s brave service members'
As Gov. J.B. Pritzker was signing a sweeping gun ban and gun registry many law enforcement officers are refusing to enforce the Pritzker family is opening a gun range as part of a museum under construction in Somers, Wis.chicagocitywire.com
"Separated at Girth""Pritzker’s cousin James Nicholas Pritzker, who in 2013 announced he is a transsexual now known as Jennifer N. Pritzker, is behind the push to move the collection north."
It's the same guy!
J.B. Pritzker
"Jennifer" Pritzker
I would urge some caution about commenting on these decisions. For openers, read the appellate court decision. It turns out that, in the lower court, the plaintiffs deferred any reliance on the Second Amendment, basing their TRO application on several Illinois state law procedural requirements for the enactment of legislation. The lower court bought these argument; the appellate court reversed on those issues. By my reading, the appellate court then nonetheless sustained most of the TRO based on its reading of the Second Amendment -- an approach (i.e., relying on an argument explicitly deferred below) that is likely to cause an even higher court to have troubles.
The appellate decision is Docket # 5-23-0035 and is apparently reported at 2023 IL App (5th) 230035. I found it at https://ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.win...LLC v. Pritzker, 2023 IL App (5th) 230035.pdf
The term "on the merits" is usually used to refer to a final decision with regard to the legal substance of the plaintiff's claim. In that sense, a TRO or PI is not "on the merits." However, one requirement for either is a "likelihood of success on the merits," to a decision on either does (or is supposed to) represent a preliminary assessment that the plaintiff's claim is not entirely out to lunch.And they are onlynTROs, they’re not on the merits. These are cases in their very very earlynstag3s.