I was very surpised to see mass.gov admits this…

[maltc]

Recent addition to their faq? Had never seen them admit that in the past. (We all know supported by mgl).

 

[Penniepup1]

Delete this thread and don’t say anything further.

 

[kalash]

It's still pretty vague though. E.g. it makes it sound like all shotguns holding over 5 rounds have to be pre-94, which is blatantly incorrect. There's a ton of nuance in MA law.

 

[allen-1]

It's still pretty vague though. E.g. it makes it sound like all shotguns holding over 5 rounds have to be pre-94, which is blatantly incorrect. There's a ton of nuisance in MA law.

“Nuisance”?

I think you misspelled “infringement”.

 

[kalash]

I meant to say nuance and my phone autocorrected to nuisance.

 

[240Geezer]

Your autocorrect was correct

 

[PaulR]

Translation: Yea ok we finally admit it, S is gonna HTF, stack up everybody.

Where is this from BTW?
Link?

 

[maltc]

It's still pretty vague though. E.g. it makes it sound like all shotguns holding over 5 rounds have to be pre-94, which is blatantly incorrect. There's a ton of nuance in MA law.

Vague but not as vague as not even acknowleding it like in the past. Kind of great they posted that under FAQ- For sure did not used to be there.

 

[maltc]

Translation: Yea ok we finally admit it, S is gonna HTF, stack up everybody.

Where is this from BTW?
Link?

Firearms License Frequently Asked Questions

This is a list of firearms related frequently asked questions.

www.mass.gov

 

[not new guy]

“Of course we respect SCOTUS and the constitution, look at this web page we have up.”

 

[greencobra]

“Nuisance”?

I think you misspelled “infringement”.

he's just using a little known french colloquialism...