Unless you're under the age of 21 and over the age of 18. You could be thinking that you were going to be shooting with your dad's .22 pistol as well as your rifle while you were both at the range.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I am going to Bass Pro Shop Today
- Thread starter swatmedic
- Start date
Unless you're under the age of 21 and over the age of 18. You could be thinking that you were going to be shooting with your dad's .22 pistol as well as your rifle while you were both at the range.
I don't think you can have both... An LTC A or B in MA is just a less restrictive FID. They just have a stupid, unclear naming structure.
You can have an FID and a LTC. I just find the FID totally useless, as most all of my guns don't "qualify" under the restrictions of an FID since 1998.
pdm
NES Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 47,608
- Likes
- 33,723
Here's an interesting question I submit for comment to the BP employees on this list:
What is the moral culpability of an employee who is basically told "do not think, do not accept info from customers, do not engage in arguments about the law***" but who, through their personal understanding of the firearms laws and AG's regulations realizes that they are participating in a sale that is either illegal (not on either list) or an unfair and deceptive trade practice (the AG's CMR) and still proceeds to assist in such sales, accept 4473's and FA10s, etc?
I am not saying that any of the BP employees necessarily knew about the AG's regulations and Glocks - I'm just asking a "what if" question that comes to mind.
*** - Particularly important when the shop's position is inconsistent with state law
What is the moral culpability of an employee who is basically told "do not think, do not accept info from customers, do not engage in arguments about the law***" but who, through their personal understanding of the firearms laws and AG's regulations realizes that they are participating in a sale that is either illegal (not on either list) or an unfair and deceptive trade practice (the AG's CMR) and still proceeds to assist in such sales, accept 4473's and FA10s, etc?
I am not saying that any of the BP employees necessarily knew about the AG's regulations and Glocks - I'm just asking a "what if" question that comes to mind.
*** - Particularly important when the shop's position is inconsistent with state law
Last edited:
To take Rob's thoughts one step further.
Under MGLs, I wonder about the LEGAL culpability of the clerks who sold the guns that aren't on the EOPS List (criminal) or AG Regs compliant (civil)? If they could be prosecuted by the AG if she so desires?
"Just following orders" didn't fly with some other illegal acts in prior times, so I'm not so sure in this case.
Under MGLs, I wonder about the LEGAL culpability of the clerks who sold the guns that aren't on the EOPS List (criminal) or AG Regs compliant (civil)? If they could be prosecuted by the AG if she so desires?
"Just following orders" didn't fly with some other illegal acts in prior times, so I'm not so sure in this case.
